Amikke boosted

Unstreaked Tit-Tyrant

Small gray flycatcher with a simple, bold facial pattern. Has a brownish gray body with a black eyeline and crown and a white eyebrow; usually has very faint streaking through the face and breast. Looks big-headed and usually perches upright. Found around forest edges at high elevations, especially near the treeline and around patches of bamboo; often forages in groups and frequently associates with mixed-species flocks. Listen for its lisping high song and stuttered “peep” call notes.

Link: ebird.org/species/unstit1
Photo Location: Peru

Amikke boosted

the thing about “never attribute to malice what can be easily explained by incompetence” is that it’s rat-fuckable

when there is functionally no difference between the two, engaging with someone as if they’re incompetent means accepting their frame, that what they’re ultimately trying to accomplish isn’t *bad*, they’re just going about it in a way with bad side-effects, and people use in bad-faith our good-faith willingness to treat them as incompetent to push their agendas

engaging with someone as if they’re malicious, on the other hand, means rejecting the harmful frame, recasting the argument in terms of “why are you trying to do this bad thing?”, and not quibbling about the details of why the thing is bad

these age-verification laws whose implementations are a form of category error is a good example; if you engage with a proponent of them with “well here’s why your implementation is bad” you’re tacitly approving the larger idea that surveliance is good, and you just disagree with the techniques; bad-faith actors use this

If instead you come back with “why are you trying to surveil everyone’s computer use? Why are you laying the groundwork to prevent people from using their own computers?”, you re-cast the frame. Sure, there are probably incompetent people who don’t realize the results of what they’re going to do, but casting the larger idea into question AND KEEPING IT IN QUESTION is the only effective path I’ve found to debating people on things like this

so, instead:

don’t ascribe to incompetence something that is functionally malicious

Amikke boosted

ROK 2137 W POLSCE. POPARCIE DLA ZWIĄZKÓW PARTNERSKICH OSIĄGNĘŁO 101%. PAPIEŻ BRAJAN I WYDAŁ BULLĘ O UZNANIU ZWIĄZKÓW JEDNOPŁCIOWYCH. PREMIEROID DNLD TVSK III *SKŁADA RĘCE Z PLASTALI W PIRAMIDKĘ* POSŁUCHAJCIE. ZBLIŻAJĄ SIĘ WYBORY W PASIE OORTA TO NIE CZAS NA OBYCZAJÓWKĘ

Amikke boosted

Welcome to making satellite shit. We have:

Asshole chip vendors
Outdated datasheets, probably from another chip revision
Drivers that don't compile (because Linux covertly broke APIs again)
Tooling without source code
Product requirements that don't make any sense and nobody knows who even wrote them
Ancient network protocols from the 80s that you need to support (I hate DEC)
Register group ANAL3 (L3 packet analysis, what did you expect?)
Software bugs that somehow only fire up during radiation testing
ECC memory? What's ECC memory? Ah shit..
$20k per unit devboards more fragile than your grandmother's ancient Radeon card with swollen capacitors
25 kbit/s reserve channel (in perfect conditions)
Faulty GPS with enormous jitter (need that for timekeeping)
QA that has no idea what it's doing

God, I fucking love my job!

Amikke boosted
Amikke boosted
Amikke boosted
Amikke boosted

See that three people have to approve everything where one would do.

Amikke boosted

We’re building a user-friendly WebAssembly language reference on MDN!

Want to help make Wasm more accessible? We’re looking for technical writers and reviewers to join the project.

Start here if you're interested: github.com/mdn/mdn/issues/821

Amikke boosted

The ActivityPub For WordPress project is, in a lot of ways, one of the most impressive projects in the space for what it has accomplished. Every release gets better and better, and there’s a robustness to the project that I can’t help but admire.

Making ActivityPub federation work with the myriad of WordPress configurations out there is nothing short of a miracle, and I’m forever grateful for the work @pfefferle and the team put in.

Amikke boosted
age verification but it's just a dialog box that asks "are you old" and the answers are "yes" and "maybe later"
Amikke boosted

The Call for Proposals for the 15th edition of @piwo Poznań Free Software Fest, a conference I'm somehow involved in, is open until Thursday (April 23th). If you're interested in sharing your perspective on topics such as digital independence, the legal aspects of FOSS, privacy software development or cybersecurity, consider submitting a talk (there's also a dedicated Python track this year). It's a great community, last year there were like 200 participants.

📆 The event's on May 30th (Saturday) at the Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science of Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań (western Poland).

➡️ Details and CfP link: https://piwo.sh/en/news/2026-03-24-call-for-proposals-is-now-open/

Boosts welcome!

EDIT: updated the deadline

RT: https://fosstodon.org/users/piwo/statuses/116399002028609823

P.I.W.O. Poznań  
⏰ Ostatnie dni CfP na P.I.W.O. 2026! Zostało już tylko kilka dni, aby zgłosić swoją propozycję prelekcji lub warsztatów. Czekamy do końca tygodnia!...
Amikke boosted

So this is a result of my photo walk. One is wild goose, the other - red kite. Both birds are very popular at the Baltic coast. #Photography #birdwatching

Show thread
Amikke boosted

It is pretty hilarious that I can't edit the book I own because the DRM thinks I'm trying to steal it, and the fix for this is simply to steal it and edit the stolen copy instead

Show thread
Amikke boosted
Amikke boosted

Why do people take less'ns? 

So they won't be more'ns

Amikke boosted

This feathered visitor recently stopped by the IRAM 30-m telescope to assist with EHT observations.

The bird had gotten lost in the fog and appeared at the control room door- more than 1,500 meters above its usual habitat.

After a brief "internship," it was safely released back into nature the next morning.

#M87MOVIE

Amikke boosted

@mhoye

As Margaret explained it to me, NASA wanted the lunar lander's actual landing to be 100% automated with no manual override. She disagreed, and insisted on implementing an override. NASA didn't like the idea but Margaret just went ahead and wrote it.

Of course, on Apollo 11's final approach, the lander was headed for a field of giant boulders. Neil Armstrong used Margaret's code to override the computer and manually divert to the actual, safer, landing point.

Amikke boosted

Andreas Kling twitter screenshot 

folks who say it's the code that matters when someone actually makes a decision based on technical merits

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.