@m0xEE @admitsWrongIfProven But it's not a marker of whether you are trans. It just means that your biological sex is what's put on official documents, not "gender identity".
I suppose if you look like a woman or a man but your passport says that you're a man or a woman respectively, then that makes you visible and easy to single out. Is that what you meant?
Still. Doesn't seem the same as marking them with a pink triangle.
@admitsWrongIfProven @m0xEE
>correct others on matters where the biology does not matter
Meaning what?
@light It does not lead to, it is a step fascists perform.
"Lead to" would mean it naturally follows, but the ostracization is just so nobody will stop the violence that comes later and is a seperate unacceptable decision.
I think you were more sensitive to ostracization in the area of mental health. Would you not say that it erodes safety for the ostracized?
@admitsWrongIfProven I don't see how this is ostracism.
https://noc.social/@light/115333261392363260
@admitsWrongIfProven
Also
>the ostracization is just so nobody will stop the violence that comes later
Why would anyone think "trans people are being marked with their biological sex rather than self-identified 'gender', therefore I don't care if they get attacked"?
Complete non-sequitur.
@light Because you neglect to take into account the already started build up of nonsensical conflict. Anyone passing well enough could mostly live their life in peace, if not for the mark. So what good is building senseless conflict if the people willing to engage in it can't spot the "enemy"?
@admitsWrongIfProven How is marking official documents by the biological sex of their bearers going to lead to putting them in concentration camps?