There is a lot of back history involved. Some admins don't like the terms of service used at Qoto -- **specifically some quite Libertarian statements** on it which I personally have made motions to change.
In some other cases it's because this instance did not block some other instance which they found deplorable and a nest of iniquity, etc.
I have been out in Diplomatic missions in the past, but not much resulted -- other than me sending detailed correspondence and sometimes being :
* told to not contact them again.
* or losing my local account at that instance for the attempt.
* or simply getting a polite rebuff on the attempt, which appears the most positive result.
#QOTO is **perceived negatively in some quarters** - and that has implications on **who sees your posts here as well**.
See these two blog posts for detailed info on some of my past attempts :
https://write.tedomum.net/rgx/when-you-discover-your-instance-is-blocked
https://write.tedomum.net/rgx/todon-nl-admin-reacts-to-polite-inquiries
@cy
Yup there is a reason we dont cave to their insanity. We do what is right in terms of server policy not what a few radicalized servers demand we do.
@design_RG @olamundo
@cy
Agreed, im all for personal control of our identity and keys
@design_RG @olamundo
@freemo @design_RG @olamundo Mostly I just wish people used public keys. Because we require a digital signature from the instance, not the user, it lets instances use their users as unwilling weapons to sabatoge other instances. I never thought I’d see it being done under benevolent pretenses, but here we are.
Maybe I should make a list of safe instances for people to join too…