@nanook no the goal post move is to say that vaers doesn't "count" because reasons. just like the heart and platelet issues didn't count because it's basically impossible to get vaxxers to accept anything as a reaction. i'm not sure how they even got myocardia on that list.

@Pat @freemo @sergeantcat

@icedquinn

Of course VARES counts. What you cant do is just say "hey look I added a all the numbers in this column and got this big number"... THAT is meaningless. If you want to infer things from VARES you need a based understanding of statistics to know how to pick out meaningful patterns. It isnt as simple as adding.

@nanook @sergeantcat @Pat

@freemo @nanook @sergeantcat @Pat

> vaccines are safe
> look at this database we made to prove how little incidents there are
> look at this yearly average
> now stop looking at the database because one of the columns has just exploded and its solely due to one newly approved thing
> quinn you just don't understand statistics

@icedquinn @freemo @Pat @nanook @sergeantcat
>multiply VAERS numbers by approximately 100 because less than 1% of cases get reported

@meowski

Meaningless in this case since you'd also have to multiple the other past vaccines by a similar number and thus would not cause any difference int he normalization.

@icedquinn @sergeantcat @Pat @nanook

@freemo @icedquinn @sergeantcat @Pat @nanook yes, also do mutiply those numbers by 100 because the stonewalling and denial of the VAERS reporting system is not a new thing.

probable exception to this is the anaphylaxis due to it being fairly hard to deny when someone immediately has an allergic reaction

here you go with this slimy shilling for no good reason again. it's like you psychologically just have to jump in and deboonk even when there's nothing to gain from it. indoctrination at its finest