Is there a rule name (in the style of “Dvorak’s Law” or “Hanlon’s Razor”) for the idea that “the encryption wasn’t compromised, rather there was a man on the inside”?
Follow
🇳🇱
That would fall under Occams razor, the answer the requires the fewest unjustified assumptions usually right.
Also Sagan's Razor would also apply extraordinary claims (like breaking encryption) require extraordinary evidence.
@freemo Aha yes, both apply well! I hadn't thought of looking at it that way