Gary Ackerman @garyackerman@qoto.org

Predictive text completion can compose insightful posts: How people make decisions regarding their young users is one key need having to do zero and work rug.

Just be because your data show the trends you want, it does not mean you are affecting the change you want.

I recently observed the degree to which educators accept whatever data they are told to use. I understand that is what they are told to do by their bosses, but we are doomed if we don’t start rejecting crappy data on an “industry”-wide basis.

I started with “s” and chose from the suggested words that my iPhone gave me to compose this post: So how is climate legislation making the economy worse?

“Man may abdicate is ability to think….” is the phrase that began a sentence in 1970. We need to calm down and become active with AI.

“Knowledge is judgment….” Yup, John Dewey was right.

The Nature of Learning and Education Policy
https://hackscience.education/2019/07/18/the-nature-of-learning-and-education-policy/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=mastodon

“We stop looking for monsters under our beds when we realize they are inside us.”
― Charles Darwin

Data that is collected in uncontrolled (or at least undescribed) settings is not reliable ... not are conclusions based on it.

If students see themselves as readers, writers, scientists, etc., then we can start.

"Do they like it?" is rarely worth asking in educational settings.

Once you define the proxy, it matters rather than the thing.

What Benkler Wrote About Networks
https://hackscience.education/2019/07/16/what-benkler-wrote-about-networks/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=mastodon

We have data, but we don't use it. Even when we think we do, we don't.

To see the problem another sees, in the same perspective and at the same angle—that amounts to something. -John Dewey

If you don't understand the material, yuor grade is meaningless.

“It is always advisable to perceive clearly our ignorance.”
― Charles Darwin

I’m really becoming curious about human’ fascination with measuring with precision things with the defining characteristic of continuity.

Is your test measuring it or causing it? How do you know?

All data is interpreted either for or against some point of view.