@QOTO
I voted for unlisted because several bots each posting several toots is a tiny bit spammy. I will suggest the idea of a bot that aggregates the bots, so to speak, one that federates and toots once a day about what arXiv bots have updated, if new ones were added, etc
@freemo
Well, we have X number of public bots, each posting x toots per day
If we unlist them, and have 1 bot that publically toots once per day to the effect of, "Check out updates from these awesome bots! As well as the newest addition to the bot team, $NEW_BOT!" then we go from the sum of Xi * xi to just 1
@QOTO
If we add more bots we are likely to always batch them at the same time.
With that said the user count bot is an exception, it posts twice a day during more active hours but thats because of its nature of announcing user count growth. Might make that one unlisted though and might bump it down to once a day and batch it too.
@jump_spider
All bots are unlisted except arXiv since it is the only bot that is unique and relevant to our STEM goals. arXiV itself is like 5 different bots though.
All arXiv posts occur once a day at the same time, in a single batch. Specifically with the intent that it wont spam throughout the day.
@QOTO