I am genuinely interested to understand how can a scientist claim that the new mRNA vaccine technology is 100% safe and doesn’t have any significant long term health effects?

There is a clear bias in the scientific community, pharmaceutical companies and public health authorities to push one simplistic narrative that the mRNA vaccine is safe and effective. Any dissenting opinion questioning the mRNA vaccine safety or efficacy is labeled idiot, conspiracy theorist and anti-vax.

This toxic scientific debate climate makes critical data gathering and research challenging. Most career driven scientists, medical doctors or researchers don’t want to go against the main narrative and lose their credentials and livelihood.

Questioning the safety and efficacy of mRNA vaccines represent a threat to the institutions mandating and advocating for that technology. A threat that might lead to vaccine hesitancy, lost in credibility, lost of financial revenue and legal liability.

There are few brave scientists with a good track records of scientific research, publications and citations. I can’t name them all, these are a few top ones that I followed their work on this topic:

There is a clear signal form various public heath safety reporting data bases and scientific research that show an increase risk of Myocarditis after the mRNA injections:

Myocarditis is one advert event among many that Pfizer own clinical trials has revealed even before vaccine mass deployment.

I can’t personally ignore or dismiss renown scientific researchers and medical doctors warnings regarding the vaccine safety and efficacy. I am not against vaccines in general, they truly save lives.

I am strongly against vaccine mandates and vaccine passports, especially since the vaccines were never tested or designed to stop the transmission.

I don’t want to live in a future dystopian technocracy were the state controls all aspects of my life, I am pro choice, liberty and informed consent.

I hope that everyone that took the mRNA shots are and will be alright.

@freemo Dr. Freemo if you reading up to this, I hope you consider the scientific research I shared here, and acknowledge the concerns that some people have regarding the mRNA vaccines.

🎓 Dr. Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱  
@ringo If i wasnt clear about my position, your an idiot if you still think the shot is dangerous at this point, though I would have agreed with ex...
Follow

@voidabyss @freemo
I am confused why you think anyone scientific ever said they thought it was 100% safe.

All the studies fright from the start indicated it risk were so much >lower< than the risks from catching Covid19 that the risk benefit of getting vaccinated was hugely in favor of getting vaccinated.

I note a total absence of evidence suggesting that is not so that has presented by you.
Actually i tell a lie, I say because I know the evidence for contradicting that doesn't from all the dozens of times i have checked claim much the same as yours in the past.

and note you do present evidence the risk is non zero,
and yes it is and always was known to be non zero,
and yes vaccine recommendations and mandates were all fully aware of that evidence and on a net benefit basis recommended and or mandated them.

On the topic of mandates, mandates in my country was on the basis of preserving people rights. At the time of mandates thepeopel mandated were mandated to be vaccinated so as to not needlessly and without consent put *other* people at unreasonable risk. No person was forced to have vaccine just required to have one if they wished to undertake activities that then added risk to other people from their decisions.
I have never seen any argument against mandates that in anyway at all attempted to acknowledge or justify why the refusers would have the right to put other people at risk without their knowledge or consent.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.