@voidabyss @freemo
As you are pro consent, and so am I, yet we reach opposite conclusions on the basis of that this seems like an ideal place to QOTO.
and given that Vaccines for COVID have been measured to reduce transmission.
(and note yes the original testing to grant the emergency use authorization did not test for that, it is subsequent research on large cohorts over longer periods that measured the effect on transmission)
but moving onto consent, as you are ... pro consent,
how can you plausibly at all be against mandatory vaccination for workers in aged care homes? That for me makes no sense at all.
Where is the consent by the elderly to be exposed to the unvaccinated?
Without the vaccine mandate, patients in the homes are neither informed about nor consent to the increased level of risk that unvaccinated health care workers pose to them.
For the purpose of keeping it simple I only wish to know about why you want that (aged care home) uninformed consent to happen. What gives those health care workers the right to enforce lack of good medical practice and care on the patients of the old folks homes?
But for reference: TBMK: There are similar removal of actual choice and unilateral imposition of risk without consent in all the other places in my country where mandatory vaccination is required in order to be allowed to put other people at risk by the risky behaviors of the unvaccinated.