It makes me ill that the Committee on Human Rights of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences had to put together a list of resources to support US researchers and scholars subjected to targeted attacks.
And it makes me ill that I have to post.
But here it is:
A reminder that Greenland is part of the Overseas Countries and Territories (OCT) of the EU and Greenlandic citizens are EU citizens.
Any move by Trump and the US to invade and annex Greenland would be a declaration of war with the EU and a gross violation of its 1951 treaty to protect Greenland from attack. (Though not ironic as the mafia never protects you from itself.) Furthermore, an attack on a NATO member would be deemed an attack on all other NATO members (Art 5) and a violation of the treaty (Art 8).
If neither EU nor NATO members did anything to protect Greenland/Denmark against the US’s overwhelming military might (as is likely) – and, remember, US troops are already in Greenland and in other EU countries also – it would signal that no EU or NATO state is safe should a stronger military decide to invade.
If anything, if the EU hasn’t understood it yet, it must start treating the US not as an ally but as a threat. Trump isn’t a clown. He’s the fascist leader of the country with – in the words of Kamala Harris – the world’s most lethal military.
We must shore up our defenses because it is becoming impossible to ignore that the EU is caught between two hostile forces: a fascist US on the one side and a fascist Russia on the other, neither of which have two shits to give about international law (that was a quaint concept while it lasted, wasn’t it?)
Either we learn to defend ourselves in the EU or we become a vassal state of Gilead. And, as much as I oppose militaries – in a world in which they very much exist – I’d much rather it wasn’t the latter.
Biodiversity & economics, limits of science rant
Because of how I understood anticapitalism, I was always against trying to calculate the economic cost of destroying nature.
Nature should not be destroyed because it's sacred. Period.
And, on a less spiritual way: as we don't have a clue* how complex ecosystems work, we should be less confident when pretending to put a price tag on ecosystem services.
But lately I am seeing economics less as a scam by greedy powerful to justify and optimize their exploitation of humans and nature (though I am still convinced that this brainwashing is the main function), but appreciate that in the strict sense, economics is just a way to make decisions. Even in an anarchist village, people do sorts of economics when taking decisions (just maybe a not based on €$¥, but more on "how much effort will it be for our community to build a new building with strawbales or with clay?"). And if we accept this role of economics, we see that it is necessary to integrate the value of biodiversity and nazure into the equation, because if we don't, we have lavk the tools to take wrll-informed decisions.
Still, it feels like that we won't be very successful in improving things if we talk about the value of pollinating wild bees for the economy instead of burning down the headquarters of the banks that finance industrial agriculture (and some other offices come to my mind, but maybe lets start with the banks...).
The problem with all this bioeconomics stuff is that it is so deeply flawed. And it's an uphill battle, as we will be always behind the "real" economy's destruction of nature.
"If you are so sure that this tropical forest is of any good, show us the numbers", they said, while destroying the ecosystem forever for a palm oil plantation...
* we really know little. We are getting better. E.g. in microbiology nowadays with molecular tools we can know *who* is there (mostly). But this leaves us with a large list of names and we don't have any idea about *what* they do. And latest when it comes to biological interactions in the real world, all we have left is to hold our hands and behold the impressive complexity and the miracles of life.
Thanks to
@blogdiva , one of your posts made me write this down.
#NaturalResourceEconomics #PluralisticEconomy #PluralEconomics #degrowth #Bioeconomy #DecisionMaking #Biidiversity #EcosystemServices #EcosystemService
Whst to do against the biodiversity crisis?
- mitigate climate change (renewable electricity, bicycle vs car, reduce flying)
- ban pesticides, especially insecticides
- agroecological transition (sustainable #SmallholderAgriculture)
- reduce light pollution
- reduce meat consumption
- consume less to live better
- #degrowth
- #taxtherich
- support indigenous people, they know how to protect the environment
- while building communities to live in a more equal society and leave behind the state, it is acceptable to vote green politics
- go out into nature with others and start understanding and caring
---
Sure, there is more. But these are some of the really high impact issues.
Personal choices matter, the wealthier you are and the more impactful your lifestyle is. It's ok to use e.g. less plastic bags because it is the right thing to do. But don't self-optimize overly. That is a neoliberal fallacy. If you are already way below the average in your region, your energy is better invested to create social change than to focus too much on yourself.
We can do this. There is no other way.
Take care and see that your live is more fulfilling trying to be part of the solution
Climate change is about the climate changing. Some areas of the world are going to become unhabitable, and some areas which were previously more difficult to live in will become prime real estate.
The question is this - do we want to maintain international boundaries as they are now, or redefine them by war?
If the former, we need to get serious of ramping down our CO2 emissions, decoupling capitalism from growth, and embracing #Degrowth (incl. population) and #ALighterTouch on the planet as founding principles.
If the latter ... ARE YOU F**KING CRAZY??
These are pretty much the choices. Apart from sticking your head in the sand and going "la-la-la" until somebody makes choice for you ...
As students' costs to attend #university continue to spiral, one might conclude that this was all part of a plan to make #highereducation unaffordable for the children from poorer families...
Not so much 'widening participation' as 'narrowing participation'.
Its almost like the Govt. was suspicious of an educated electorate?
Just when you think that maybe, just maybe we're managing to leverage this machine for Good, building green energy tarrifs to steer capitalism into fixing our #climatecrisis, capitalism conspires to burn us all alive anyway:
https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-63089348
It’s official: July was the hottest month ever recorded on Earth. The US is =finally= acting on transitioning to a clean-energy economy, thanks to Biden’s infrastructure bill, but we really REALLY need to get on the stick with this. There’s no time to waste. #CleanPowerNOW, folks. Not seven years from now; not three months from now. NOW. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/july-2023-is-hottest-month-ever-recorded-on-earth/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=earth&utm_content=link&utm_term=2023-08-02_featured-this-week#CleanPowerNow #Climate #ClimateTech #ClimateChaos #sustainability
The most interesting side of the #Seattle cop says the horrific quiet part out loud episode is that SPOG tried to get in front of the outrage. They knew the tape was coming out so they got with a right wing radio talker to try to launder their side of the story
It didn't work, people are justifiably apoplectic
If the unbelievable hidden context you're trying to provide is part of a deliberate attempt to get out ahead of bad news, I'm not going to trust it
Dan Unglenieks
📍 Marquette Michigan
Co-founder & Crew Chief of Radix Racing Collective, a grassroots motorsports crew service and crew training organization
I may have a BS in Natural Resource Sustainability but at my day job I'm a Broadcast Engineer and IT Administrator