Recently looking into formal diagnosis options as my AQ-50 test wasn't just 'positive' as autistic but POSITIVE!!?!. If anyone's got UK experience/suggestions, give me a shout. Or pointers towards useful communities or tags on here.

@freemo I feel like I should have played with this more back when I had a school lab instead of a laptop. Is there an observable difference if you do it in a vacuum bell jar or N2 atmosphere?

@freemo wire wool and a 9V cell is a nice demo which sets the scene for fuses. Although it also teaches kids how to start fires, McGyver-style.

To add to my first point; it would work well with 'How To Read A Paper' style approaches (ref @trishgreenhalgh ?) and similar resources. When I was in the classroom I found the NHS Behind The Headlines blog to be really useful, which has for some stupid reason been retired. There's a useful guide, similar to what I used to share with students, at
powerfulpatients.org/2017/03/2

Show thread

Sharing this (seen on birdsite) for science teacher colleagues for two reasons.
1 it would be a great starter paper for any yr12/13 journal clubs you're running next year.
2 translating these principles to educational research would be interesting, as it so often gets over-interpreted by SLT!

journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol

Ten simple rules for socially responsible science

Guidelines concerning the potentially harmful effects of scientific studies have historically focused on ethical considerations for minimizing risk for participants. However, studies can also indirectly inflict harm on individuals and social groups through how they are designed, reported, and disseminated. As evidenced by recent criticisms and retractions of high-profile studies dealing with a wide variety of social issues, there is a scarcity of resources and guidance on how one can conduct research in a socially responsible manner. As such, even motivated researchers might publish work that has negative social impacts due to a lack of awareness. To address this, we propose 10 simple rules for researchers who wish to conduct socially responsible science. These rules, which cover major considerations throughout the life cycle of a study from inception to dissemination, are not aimed as a prescriptive list or a deterministic code of conduct. Rather, they are meant to help motivated scientists to reflect on their social responsibility as researchers and actively engage with the potential social impact of their research.

journals.plos.org

@noodlemaz it's a sunk-cost thing, isn't it? And we've all spent years building up a network in one place... I often come back to the old story about boiling a frog. But yes, more effort here (starting with following as many of my Twitter network as possible)

It's been a few months since I created this profile, but it's not been used. But Twitter is getting steadily worse for non-paying users with poorly-targeted adverts, so I'm aiming for a complete transition by the autumn. Hi all...

@DrRacheal I'm currently injured so can't run at all, really missing it. Glad it's working for you!

To introduce myself; ex-physics teacher in the UK, currently at IOP supporting/developing the community of physics teachers. Husband/parent, humanist/atheist, writer/reader, runner/climber.

Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.