Karthik @Karthikdeva@qoto.org

@Warhorse @_lunawinters
Its certainly not a win for muslim community. How?
ASI found proof of 'some' structure from 12th century. It could've been a buddhist temple too. ASI finding were also disputed and findings were not constant.
The mosque built in 15th century stayed with muslims until it was demolished in 1992 by terrorists.
If hindu community went to SC and got the land purely by judiciary means, then its fine. But they took it by force. The same SC acknowledged that it was an act of desecration.
1, ASI found proof for some structure
2, Babri Mosque stood for 400 years
Number 2- is a fact. Written in history.
Number 1- is not a fact. A structure alone doesn't give them right to assume its a temple.
RSS-VHP hooligans in lakhs went to a place of worship and demolished it , & 3 decades later, they get to keep it?
A democracy must be backed by facts. Not some fictional character like Ram. India is dictated by sentiments of religion. That's how I see this verdict.

@_lunawinters wow 🤣

@Warhorse Agreed. But I don't see our media doing that. For the past few years media didn't stand up for minorities.

The precedence set by #AyodhyaVerdict will influence India for years to come.
Implications are wide , especially for country like India with 1.3 billion population.
(I'd have said the same even if the verdict was opposite).
Having said that, We #Indians have to respect the SC.

@Deepsealioness This judgement was not at all surprising considering how CJI Ranjan Gogoi been reacting to various issues lately (Like NRC, Article 370 etc)

#AyodhyaVerdict
SC : Disputed site given to Ramjanmabhoomi nyas.

யாதும் ஊரே யாவரும் கேளிர்- கணியன் பூங்குன்றனார்
(To us all towns are our own, everyone our kin-Kaṉiyan Pūngunṟanār )
His famous Tamil quote "Yaadhum Oore Yaavarum Kelir" is at present depicted in the United Nations Organisation. #AyodhyaVerdict

#AyodhyaVerdict , Supreme court is making sure they're dealing with a land dispute and not a matter of faith between religions

#AyodhyaVerdict
'BabrI Masjid was not constructed on vacant land. There was a structure underlying the disputed structure and it was not an Islamic one. ASI finding suggests a 12th century Temple" - Supreme Court