這次中國白紙革命的外媒報導紀錄串:
"Beijing has been relying largely on domestically developed vaccines with a lower efficacy than mRNA shots. Meanwhile, frequent lockdowns have kept businesses closed and pushed up youth unemployment, with China now facing its worst slowdown in decades.
Wary of the high stakes, China’s top leadership earlier this month unveiled plans to “optimize and adjust” the policy to rescue the economy. However, local officials across the country doubled down on restrictions when cases started to rise recently."
路透社的報導相對帶點距離:
"During the weekend, protesters in cities including Wuhan and Lanzhou overturned COVID testing facilities, while students gathered on campuses across China in actions that were sparked by anger over an apartment fire late last week in the far western city of Urumqi that killed 10 people."
有記者被毆打的BBC這次直白很多:
"For a political organisation with no greater priority than remaining in power, this is as big a challenge as they come.
The government appears to have drastically underestimated growing discontent towards the zero-Covid approach - a policy inextricably linked to Mr Xi, who recently pledged there would be no swerving from the policy."
澳廣特別作了一段兩分鐘訪問:
"It was unclear why they were so far away, but some said fire engines were blocked by pandemic-control barriers or by cars stranded after their owners were put in quarantine."
CNN則是把烏魯木齊火警影片放開頭, 四通橋掛橫幅影片放結尾, 串聯起中國疫情下的反抗動靜:
"Meanwhile, hopes that Beijing might be signaling a slight softening of its zero-Covid approach – after minor relaxations in some quarantine requirements – are beginning to fade amid an uptick in cases as China heads into its fourth winter of the pandemic..
The government appears to have drastically underestimated growing discontent towards the zero-Covid approach - a policy inextricably linked to Mr Xi, who recently pledged there would be no swerving from the policy."
https://www.cnn.com/2022/11/26/asia/xinjiang-urumqi-china-lockdown-protests-intl-hnk
台灣的中央社除了有把發生抗議的七個主要城市標記出來外, 也找出了白紙運動的起始點:
"一段流傳甚廣、據稱為昨晚所拍但無法獨立查證的影片顯示，一名女子獨自站在南京中國傳媒大學台階上，手拿一張紙，後來一名身分不明男子走入現場搶走它。
其他圖像顯示，隨後有其他數十人拿著白紙走上大學台階，他們用手機的手電筒照亮夜空。
後來可以見到一名男子斥責抗議人群。在路透社所看到的影片裡他說道：「有一天你們會為你們今天的所作所為付出代價。」
人群中有人喊道：「國家也必須為它所做的事付出代價。」"
https://www.cna.com.tw/news/acn/202211270213.aspx?topic=4075
美聯社的照片表現很鳥:
"In a possible attempt to placate the public, authorities on Saturday announced they had achieved “societal zero-COVID” and restrictions in Urumqi and Korla would be relaxed. The government said taxi, railway, bus and other public services that had been suspended for weeks would resume. State-owned China Southern Airlines announced it would resume flights from Urumqi to four Chinese cities starting Monday."
https://apnews.com/article/taiwan-health-china-fires-covid-4ffc00e5f6761be48f5887d57d66c708
自由時報則是從推特找材料:
"前英國廣播公司《BBC》駐香港記者吳若珊週日在推特分享一份由網友整理的學校名單，顯示烏魯木齊慘劇消息曝光的25日開始，截至27日上午的短短3天內，中國已有50多所大學出現學生抗議行動，當中不乏排名頂尖的名校，學生紛紛挺身表達對封控的憤怒、對自由的追求以及對受害者的哀悼。"
衛報則是將這波抗議風潮定位為公民不服從運動:
“The people here aren’t violent, but the police are arresting them for no reason. They tried to grab me but the people all around me grabbed my arms so hard and pulled me back so I could escape.”
順手補:
"公民是源自上古時代的城邦。並不是每一個住在城邦的人，都是公民，城邦裡面有很多「居民」，他可以是一些流浪的旅人，或者是依附的人，或者奴隸，這些都是居民，但不是公民。
公民與其他居民的分別，在於城邦受到威脅時，需要自備武器盔甲去出戰，也只有負擔起武器盔甲的人，才能夠成為公民。
每個城邦對公民的義務和權利定義不一樣，但基本上「你能負起義務」是成為公民的基礎，如果你無力去參戰，沒有錢去負擔起武器盔甲，那就自然不能成為公民，不能享有公民的權利。
你參戰，所以你有權投票，很簡單，因為城邦需要你的戰力，而城邦的政策又影響到你在戰場上的生死，投票權就順理成章的產生。
公民是古代城邦形成戰力的要素，權利是令城邦能保衛自己的原因。政治與軍事權力和義務是雙生的。
東方的百姓，只等於西方的奴隸，或者現代一點的說法，「納稅人」，他們在社會的主要地位就是納稅服役，提供勞動力和物質財富。而他們的權利呢？不太有，勉強就只是弄出法律令他們不要互相殘殺得太離譜。他們不擁有政治權力，也不是土地的主人，自然地，他們也不太認為對於王朝有任何責任，只是沒有機會，但一旦機會來了就會樂意推翻統治者。而且將所有責任推到統治者頭上，把他們全家殺光。
這種「無責任」是百姓的特徵，而無責任源自無權利，而公民則汪重責任與權利的均等，成為百姓是被迫的，成為公民是自願的。所以百姓與公民根本是兩種不同的東西，"
武漢大學特有種:
"校方傳出因應最新防疫政策，研擬恢復實體教學，同時也允許學生返鄉但卻未提及期末考日期、因應方式，學生不滿校方踢皮球遲遲未回應相關質疑，昨集體包圍行政大樓抗議，「推特」流傳，學生們互相要求不喊「政治口號、不拿白紙」，他們口號為「回應訴求、自願返鄉、訊息透明、政策公開」。
校方黨政辦、老師代表一度要求與1至兩名學生代表協商，但遭學生反對，最後由100多名學生進行協商並達多項決議，包含返鄉學生可選擇考試、上課方式；校內設施逐漸開放以利留校學生；不追究學生責任等。"
靠抗議掙來的解封:
"Given that China’s leaders were already seeking a way to exit zero-Covid measures, the protests became a way to justify the pivot, said the University of Chicago’s Mr. Yang. They now need to focus on getting more of China’s large elderly population vaccinated, he said"
自由亞洲電台深度訪問僥倖逃脫的參與者並曝露了中國警方偏好逮捕女性抗議者並施暴的現象:
"我们看到有很多的警察在那里打哈切，我们就走到警察防线后边。因为警察防线是在机动车道上，我们就走人行道，走到他们后边。其实这是有点危险的，因为容易被他们切段。
然后大概是5点半左右开始，我就看到大概每十分钟就有一到两个人被抓走。被抓走的人大部分是女性。我后来也被抓走了，我被抓到车上后，就看到后面有好多的人正在被他们暴打。"
https://www.rfa.org/mandarin/yataibaodao/renquanfazhi/wy-11282022094229.html
WSJ今天則進一步指出極權面對政策後果反撲時只能更加強硬的心理機制:
“The danger is that if the leadership responds with repression, that could take China down a vicious cycle of control, leading to more grievances, to more control,”
臉書上則能找到對烏魯木齊高風險社區火災傷亡事件官民資訊對照的網頁備份:
"其中的16楼有户人家，是一个老人在家带着三个孩子。她起先的呼救，还非常镇定。先说家里烟大，请求救援。再问邻居，自己要怎么办。过不了多久，呼救声变得虚弱，说求求你们，孩子们都已经出现缺氧了。最后一声呼救，是两声愤怒的吼叫。
那是她对这个世界的无限愤怒。
这户人家的父母，因为疫情被困在和田。三个孩子在昨天火灾中，全都去世了，最小的才五岁。"
美國之音報導了中國留美學生的響應活動:
"33年前，为抗议中共军队武力镇压北京市民和学生，中国留学生曾在哥大图书馆前的同一台阶广场上举行集会活动。自那以来，星期一晚间的集会规模或许是唯一可与之相比的中国留学生参与的抗议活动。"
法廣的特約記者則報導了德國總統的表態:
“我只能把我们所看到的与希望结合起来，希望中国当局尊重这种自由表达和示威自由的权利。”
中國傳聲筒之一的南華早報推特帳號則是把各國中生聲援畫面剪在一起, 起源地的上海畫面則只有廿秒:
https://twitter.com/SCMPNews/status/1597490787255607297?s=20&t=ad_Be6glWLYL2VP47ALp4Q
WSJ嗅到了潛在的(?)中國現行防疫政策放軟可能性:
"It is unclear if the softened messaging will translate into concrete actions by local officials who are bound by Beijing’s dual mandates of imposing Covid controls and ensuring people’s livelihoods, researchers say."
WSJ也注意到中國政府壓制異議並未放鬆:
"Chinese authorities appear to be preventing fresh protests from taking root by deploying large numbers of police at the sites of planned protests in major cities. On Tuesday, a planned protest in Shenzhen was canceled after large numbers of police turned up at several locations in the city, according to messages on social media reviewed by The Wall Street Journal. Similarly, protests on Monday were canceled in Beijing and Shanghai."
WSJ這篇報導防疫政策下的就業問題是個明眼人都知道的惡性循環：清零防疫妨礙市場恢復，進而推高失業，連帶增加維穩壓力，眼下的槍桿子結實，鎮壓個白紙運動是沒問題，但怎麼拆掉錢袋子裡被防疫雪上加霜的金融危機引信，那才棘手:
"At the same time, government efforts to purge excess debt in the property market and bring risk-taking private companies to heel deterred investment and led to mass layoffs. Frustratingly for many young people, the government’s property market clampdown so far hasn’t brought prices down to an affordable level in many places, even as it destabilized some developers."
自由亞洲電台採訪了白紙運動裡重要消息來源的推特用戶[ 李老師不是你老師] :
"印象最深刻的可能是两个吧。一个就是在直播里，当看到富士康的大门被民众点燃，然后这些人和警察对抗的时候，这是我印象最深刻的事情，因为很多年了，我没有见过这种群体性的事件，特别是以这种现场直播的方式让我看到这件事情。
另一件就是上海昨天（26日）晚上，大家一起大喊，罢免国贼习近平、共产党下台。这两件事情是让我印象最深刻的。还有就是成都。成都今天（27日）晚上非常不一样，因为他们在游行的时候，时刻都在保护身边的人，他们会不断提醒防止踩踏，然后互相帮忙。然后非常感动的是上海，当警察去抓人，大家就去阻止，互相去把那个人拉回来。"
https://www.rfa.org/mandarin/yataibaodao/meiti/wy-11292022160956.html
駭客也來助陣:
"白紙革命除了有陸地上的遊行抗爭，匿名者也在網路上開拓新主場，使用「白紙行動」（#OpWhitePaper）當作主題標籤。匿名者一度激動寫道「X他X習近平」、「放過台灣、放過中國」；可惜的是目前網路聲量還未發酵，匿名者幾乎每隔一小時就會發一則推文，或一個小時內發好幾則，希望得到更多人的支持。
匿名者亦在推文揭露「中國警政高層」電話和姓名對照表，包括上海警察、上海共產黨員、以及疫情嚴峻地區廣東省的高級官員。除此之外，匿名者上傳中國官方網站被駭影片，只見畫面不斷跑出中國官方網站的網址，以實際行動拆除中國網路「防火牆」。"
WSJ也注意到李老師現象:
"Some Chinese people have used VPNs to access sites like Twitter and broadcast information about the recent protests. They will often send material via the platform’s messaging system to a handful of widely followed Twitter users. One Twitter account calling itself Li Laoshi, or Teacher Li, with more than 750,000 followers, has been posting dozens of videos of unrest in China since the weekend."
看到被捕者分享過程感到驚訝: 中國警方採集被逮捕者的指紋跟掌紋也就算了, 採集血樣跟虹膜是甚麼道理?
身在自由世界如我再度驚訝於中國就這樣讓CCP搞成Cyberpunk World:
"It is impossible to take a taxi or walk into a coffee shop in Beijing without being required to scan a QR code that gives the government a record of one’s movements. If the government deems a person has crossed paths with the virus, that person could be hauled off to centralized quarantine or, if lucky, confined to their home for several days."
WSJ對李老師現象及其安徽家人受到騷擾的後續報導:
"Foreign social-media accounts such as Mr. Li’s have acted as a news archive on social unrest in China when Chinese media has reported very little about resistance to Covid controls and Beijing has curtailed foreign media coverage of the country."
米國駐中使館所發的緊急通知可視為中國短期內封控更嚴甚至出現軍事鎮壓的預警:
"We encourage all U.S. citizens to keep a 14-day supply of medications, bottled water, and food for yourself and any members of your household."
https://china.usembassy-china.org.cn/u-s-mission-china-statement-to-american-citizens-2/#emergency
中共在這波事後秘密清算裡也是特別針對女性下手:
"根據報導，第一批因參加抗議活動而被警方逮捕的人是四名女性，先是會計事務所職員李元婧及自由撰稿人李思琪，然後英美文學碩士翟登蕊，幾天後北大出版社編輯曹芷馨也被帶走。這四人是朋友，她們在北京辦讀書會、看電影，討論女權主義和LGBTQ權益等社會問題。"
補紐時中文網版本:
"在某种程度上，中国的困境是习近平本人造成的。中国一直坚持严厉的“新冠清零”政策，目的是消除新冠病毒感染，尽管国内的疫苗接种工作已落后于世界其他地方。三年来，中国政府的宣传机器大力支持严厉防控措施，辩称那是保护生命的唯一办法。官媒大肆宣传新冠病毒在世界其他许多地区不受控制的传播所造成的可怕后果。"
補粵語YouTuber的Jer仔所說目前中國境內有十五省共七十九所大學響應的影片:
小翠那邊一開始就補上北京倆小夥對口相聲懟小粉紅所謂的境外勢力特別有笑果~🤣 🤣
目前唯一已知逆風支持境外勢力說法的是中天電視的YouTube 頻道「中天朋友圈」
@Perfume 这些同白纸革命冇关系 上海共产党员名单是2020年泄露的
@amokhuxley 只能說；不意外～🤷♂️🤷♀️🤷
向來左傾的紐約時報這篇動用四名記者並附有照片與各地抗議影片:
“Later we shouted, ‘No nucleic acid tests, we want freedom’ and ‘No to health codes,’” she said. “I felt like finally I could say what I’ve wanted to say.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/11/27/world/asia/china-covid-protest.html?smid=url-share