南海議題的法國聲音:

"兩年前，一艘中國船為了阻止一艘美國軍艦在南中國海航行曾經近距離靠近美國船隻，離船尾的距離僅為五十米，這是違背海上航行的國際規定的。我並不相信美國或者日本船隻會作出同樣的行為來干涉中國艦隊的操練，儘管三國之間在南海問題上存在諸多分歧，但是，中國人完全有權利在南海進行操練，無論南中國海是否屬於中國，同樣，其他國家的船隻也同樣有權利在南海航行，因為這裡並不是中國的內海。"

"當然，我們去南中國海，北京會不滿意，但是，法國此舉的目的就是要捍衛聯合國的公海自由海洋的公約，《聯合國海洋法公約》是由一百多個國家簽署的公約，這一公約不能夠因為某一個國家的利益而被棄之不顧。這是法國軍隊巡航的唯一原因，在瑪麗安娜巡航任務結束之後，現在又有 代號為聖女貞德的演習，法國海軍將與美國，日本，澳大利亞等國的海軍在南海舉行聯合軍演，也是出於同樣的目的，在演習結束之後，法國軍艦將返回土倫港，這也是一次捍衛自由航行的演習，在一個可以自由航行的海域，南中國海並不是中國的內湖，也不可能成為中國的一條內湖。"

https://www.rfi.fr/cn/%E5%B0%88%E6%AC%84%E6%AA%A2%E7%B4%A2/%E8%A6%81%E8%81%9E%E8%A7%A3%E8%AA%AA/20210504-%E6%B3%95%E5%9C%8B%E8%BB%8D%E4%BA%8B%E5%B0%88%E5%AE%B6%E8%A9%95%E7%BE%8E%E4%B8%AD%E5%8D%97%E4%B8%AD%E5%9C%8B%E6%B5%B7%E5%B0%8D%E9%99%A3%E8%88%87%E5%8F%B0%E7%81%A3%E7%9A%84%E9%87%8D%E8%A6%81%E6%80%A7

回顧南海仲裁五年後的影響:

"The Award has also provided a legal basis for regional and extra-regional countries to clarify their positions on the South China Sea issues. This was seen in the diplomatic note exchange from late December 2019 to January 2021, which prompted a flurry of 25 notes verbales, two letters, and one statement by 11 regional and extra-regional players on issues pertinent to the South China Sea region: Brunei (one statement), China (nine notes verbales and one letter), Malaysia (three notes), the Philippines (three notes), Vietnam (three notes), Indonesia (two notes), the United States (one letter), and Australia, France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and Japan (one note each)."

https://thediplomat.com/2021/07/the-south-china-sea-arbitration-award-5-years-and-beyond/

南海仲裁案的連結:

https://pca-cpa.org/en/cases/7/

對做出南海仲裁的常設仲裁法院之介紹:

"The Permanent Court of Arbitration is one of the oldest in the world but it is not part of the United Nations system of courts and tribunals. The PCA is a misnomer because it is not a court with a permanent panel of judges. It is in fact a facility that contains a chamber suitable for arbitral hearings. It also has a law library, legal archive, and administrative and support staff."

https://thediplomat.com/2021/07/who-decided-the-philippines-versus-china-case/

難怪連印尼都狂買武器:

"Farhan said that China, in a separate letter, also protested against the predominantly land-based Garuda Shield military exercises in August, which took place during the standoff.

The exercises, involving 4,500 troops from the United States and Indonesia, have been a regular event since 2009. This was China's first protest against them, according to Farhan."

https://news.yahoo.com/exclusive-china-protested-indonesian-drilling-060616113.html

印尼與中國在南海的緊張點:

"據一家參與評估鑽探的俄羅斯能源商透漏，印尼政府於 2007 年跟一家英國私人公司簽訂了勘探合約，納土納海域的石油儲量估計為 1 億桶。法漢表示，中國過去並沒有就印尼探勘能源一事提出正式文件，而此次則是選擇在 9 月中國逗留印尼納土納群島外專屬經濟區引爭議之時發出外交照會，法漢說：「這些信件沒有（明言）任何威脅，但在我個人看來，我們必須將他們的態度視為是威脅，因為中國首次就南中國海或北納土納群島的領土主張發出外交公報。」"

https://pourquoi.tw/2021/12/07/intlnews-seasia-211130-211206-1/

因為印尼與中國在該區域尚未發生衝突事件，沒法寫成衝突點，寫成紅點又太輕描淡寫，只好用緊張點來形容，望周知。

中企所到之處盡皆疑問:

"多年來，引進中國工人引發了國內對就業市場衝擊的激烈批評，特別是因為其中許多人是非法進入印尼的。眾所周知，印尼人對中國工人的負面情緒仍然很高，甚至會影響新首都計劃成為國內政治爭議的主題。"

https://pourquoi.tw/2022/02/15/intlnews-seasia-220208-220214-3/