@freemo
but— but that's how it works...
@freemo
It may be, it may not be. A lot of people have served, fought, and had friends and family die for what they believe the flag represents, so an entertainer communicating that everything that flag represents is offensive is offensive to them. I think that offending them must have been the point, it was just done for a reaction, then people are offended by the reaction and everyone involved becomes a self righteous victim. I think football is silly, politicizing it is silly, reacting at the reactions of others reactions to it is silly, none of it productive.
@4of92000
@freemo @4of92000
If constructive, useful, change was desired, I think a better approach would have been to embrace the flag and call people to the ideals even they believe it represents, but instead we just have virtue signaling and mutual taking offense.
But I'm not a public figure making millions to entertain people in one of the few venues where they've always been able to reach across to others from all sides of issues and connect as one community over sports. So destroying that environment and turning it into a polarizing event hasn't ever been an option for me to consider. I'm also not the president who took the opportunity to amplify the polarization. I'm just a non sports fan who is sad to see the sports fans lose that reach across environment.
@SecondJon My stance is this. I dont think its a bad thing if you personally are patriotic to your country or feel a great deal of pride or importance behind the pledge. However the second you condemn others for not agreeing with your form of patriotism thats a problem. Never mind the irony of it being contrary to the very thing america originally stood for...
@4of92000