Every time I wade into the "JS vs no-JS" argument, I regret it. I always feel that I'm being made into a strawman arguing that every site everywhere should require JS. But then again, maybe I'm not extending the same courtesy to the other side. When I read Remy's post, I read it as "every site should work without JS." Maybe I should just say this:
- A website is built with technologies
- Technologies have tradeoffs
- There is no one right way to do it
@hansw
Would you mind I ask what is this paper about? I knew it's COVID-19 related.📜
"You won't be impacted by these changes unless you've been inactive or over your storage limit for two years. As this policy goes into effect 1 June 2021, the earliest it would be enforced is 1 June 2023."
Thanks, I saw [''] on a list of English words, and I wanted make sure that is the wrong word. So far all the people think he same as me.
Share with you a song about single mother:
https://youtu.be/papuvlVeZg8
I like paper books too, recently I'm reading <The legend of sleepy hollow>.📖
Technically, this isn't an English language test, so as long as people in the conversation understand each other.
Everyone makes mistakes.
Does it happened to you that when using startpage tell you the server is working on it and then refresh or wait a sec and try this page again?
yes I heard that.
Gender: he/him
QOTO.org moderator.