@rnitsch

This. I understand going against a research or an hypothesis, trying to get it down or demolish it, but censorship on a valid research? We wouldn't have had Darwin, Newton, Wegener or Patterson that way.

And is not like fact go away just because you close your eyes, anyway.

What I think is disturbing is the technical possibility that is there for a majority to put so many obstacles on a scientific work.
There is a big flaw in the oligopoly of a few big research papers that owns the copyright of most of the researches right now, and that is something I find deeply disturbing.

Do you know of works being done to solve such a gigantic issue?

@realmattseymour @peterdrake