barefootstache @barefootstache@qoto.org

#DailyBloggingChallenge (221/250)

An alternative option is repository piggy-backing. The means take one of the permitted repositories and mirror one's own repository to it.

A nice side effect of this is that the code is now at two locations.

#DailyBloggingChallenge (220/250)

One downside of using #Vercel is that it does not integrate directly with #Codeberg.

https://vercel.com/docs/deployments/git

Thus there exists the Vercel CLI tool.

#DailyBloggingChallenge (219/250)

The #MyRuckClub project uses #Vercel as its cloud frontend. This has the benefit of getting the app up and running fairly quickly.

As an #IndieDev the goal is to get the product as fast as possible to future users, so that one can iterate over versions quicker.

#DailyBloggingChallenge (218/250)

How damaging is it sharing gibberish online?

Considering most things are just opinions that can be factually or subjectively true, it is the reader's duty to question if the information presented creates any reaction.

This is what #qoto is all about.

#DailyBloggingChallenge (216/250)

Two other noticeable differences is the amount of smoke and the heat.

The teepee method generally is cooler and produces more smoke. The coolness is due to the lack of air flow and smoke amount from the amount of obstruction between the flame and the sky/top.

On the other side, the self feeding method generally is hotter and produces less smoke, since it is the opposite of the teepee method.

#DailyBloggingChallenge (215/250)

The main difference between the teepee method and self feeding method is the direction the coals travel and/or the location of the fuel source in the second phase.

With the teepee method the coals stay at the bottom and the fuel is from above.

Whereas with the self feeding the coals start at the top and slowly burn its way to the bottom and taking the fuel initially from the bottom and later from the sides.

#firemaking #bushcraft #survival

#DailyBloggingChallenge (214/250)

There are three general phases when creating a fire.

The phases being:

1. The initial lighting phase until the first coals appear.
2. Initial coals exist though still have initial kindling and/or need be fed consistantly to keep the fire going.
3. No real knowledge or attention needed to keep the fire going. Just occasionally add fuel and ignore for awhile.

#firemaking #bushcraft #survival

#DailyBloggingChallenge (213/250)

The only #firemaking technique I was taught by my father was the teepee method and it seems like the standard that most people (only) know.

When showing such people the top down method aka the self feeding method, they excuse it with "it is impossible" or "that is not how fire physics works".

#bushcraft #survival

#DailyBloggingChallenge (212/250)

Always thought that tree rinds would make good kindling until recently while trying to start a #fireplace and it failing after multiple attempts. Under closer inspection I realized that they were producing a lot of smoke but not feeding the fire.

Further I suspect, even if the rinds are under cover, though stored outside, that they can sponge up some of the humidity and thus leading to the higher smoke amount, especially if it rain in the recent time.

#bushcraft #survival #firemaking #WoodenStove

#DailyBloggingChallenge (211/250)

Now the company isn't dumb and puts its purchase price $K$ that low. They justify the price based off of the mean/medium duration an user spends on the app, the amount of ads they have watched and how much it generated.

So if one knows one is an outlier in app usage, then it is better to purchase earlier than latter. Super users come by rarely and benefit the most from not being milked for ad impressions.

#DailyBloggingChallenge (210/250)

If that hasn't been a good enough justification to purchase the ad-free of the app, another devious option is the thought that one is reducing the total milking the app can do onto oneself.

Let's say the one time purchase is $K$ while neglecting the time needed to purchase. Now let's say one uses the app daily for an hour and watches 10 x 2min ads with each paying 10% of currency.

From the hour of usage 20 min were used to watch ads, which generated 1 currency.

Generally speaking $K\in\[5,15\]$ which means approximately after one to two weeks one would have gotten the money's worth of the purchase plus enjoyed ca 2 - 4 hours of app usage time.

Now if one has been using it daily over multiple weeks, one is unlikely to stop abruptly and thereby with the one time purchase won't produce anymore income for the company.

On the flip side, no purchase means the company gets to continue to milk the user for ad impressions.

#DailyBloggingChallenge (209/250)

When comparing a #coffee or drink to an app fee, one questions the value of the beverage, which in the best case can give multiple hours of enjoyment for the next upcoming time frame. In comparison, an app can give this enjoyment across a larger time frame and can more easily be shared among users and locations.

It'd be ludicrous to play a #MobileGame, watch its ad while sipping one's preferred beverage.

#DailyBloggingChallenge (208/250)

When looking at apps that use external ads, I am a fan of offering a one time purchase to remove these ads.

To justify such a purchase, one should question how much the fee is, how many hours will one play and/or has played, how much is one's hourly wage, and compare the fee to other day-to-day purchases that one doesn't second guess like a #coffee or drink at the bar.

#DailyBloggingChallenge (207/250)

Most #MobileGame have some way that they earn money. The typical model one sees is offer the app for free and then pack it with ads aka external ads. Another model is to offer a pack of goodies which are either given instantly or rewarded across a ranking system among an event or season aka internal ads.

A less frequent model is to buy the game directly, which is more popular on other devices.