Show newer

I've switched from to as my mobile client for . A long time ago I tried using Twidere for Twitter but it wasn't great, and I just kept it for Mastodon. But I notice that it doesn't properly handle the extended character limit on QOTO and it also doesn't show the extra links on profiles.

"To be clear: there is nothing magical about federated worlds. If a federated social media is better than the centralized incumbents, it will be because people made a conscious choice to make it better - not because of any technological determinism. Open, decentralized systems offer new choices towards a better online world, but it’s up to us to make those choices."

"The Fediverse Could Be Awesome (if we don’t screw it up" by Cindy Cohn and Rory Mir from the Electronic Frontier Foundation eff.org/deeplinks/2022/11/fedi

"Things I Hate About the Internet: False Accusations," on how I am often told to disable my even when I don't use one (I'm not against , only ) collectedoverspread.tumblr.com

Things I Hate About the Internet: False Ad-Blocking Accusations

Every so often, I visit a website and I’m told to disable my ad blocker. In some cases it even prevents me from reading the page until I do. There is some debate about whether this sort of restriction (“ad blocker blocking”?) is right or wrong, but the fundamental problem with this, at least in my case, is that the premise is entirely false. I don’t use any ad blockers. I don’t use ad blockers because I’m not fundamentally opposed to online advertising. What I am opposed to is tracking my activity across different websites, which is why I use tools that help prevent this, such as Privacy Badger, the DuckDuckGo Privacy Browser, and Firefox’s tracking protection features. And that’s where the false accusations come from. Much of the cross-site tracking I am opposed to is done through ads, so naturally these tools will block the ads. And since the ads are being blocked, some websites assume that I’m running an ad blocker and so they ask me to disable it. Obviously, if something in my browser is blocking ads, then it’s functioning like an ad blocker, so the accusation isn’t entirely baseless. But what bothers me is that I’m not going out of my way to block ads. Like I said, I’m not opposed to online advertising, but I don’t want companies to build a profile of my entire Web-browsing activity in the process. As far as I can tell, the main justification for this sort of tracking is to provide more relevant ads. Okay, sure, but why not just tailor ads based on the page I’m on? I think if I’m on a page about, say, hiking, then there’s a good chance I’m interested in buying things like hiking boots. It’s still relevant but doesn’t require tracking my entire browsing activity. And I guess I’m fine with tracking my activity just on a single site, because it doesn’t have the same privacy ramifications as tracking across multiple sites. (So, for example, if I already bought hiking boots from that website, then it can give me fewer ads for those and more for other related products.) I’m sure there are reasons why companies insist on pushing ad tracking to its limits, probably with currency symbols attached to them. But it frustrates me that, even when I (begrudgingly) accept the ad-based model of funding free services on the Internet, I still get accused of trying to circumvent it.

Tumblr

@freeschool Hmm... I don't think it really covers that (either the essay as a whole or one sentence I picked out), if I understand you correctly.

@amerika I suppose "politics" is itself a bit fuzzy, so here are the specifics I had in mind:

Sociopolitical groups: Left and right wings (US politics), feminism, men's rights movement, Black Lives Matter

Non-political groups: Fan communities, gender identity (broadly, such as male/female), sexual orientation (again, broadly, such as straight/gay/bi)

At the same time though I do identify
with non-political groups with fuzzy boundaries, so why not political groups as well?

One obvious difference is that identifying with non-political groups invites far less controversy. But I think the more fundamental difference is the presence/lack of "central"/"typical" instances/characteristics. At least for the sociopolitical groups I can think of, it's hard for me to pick these out because the groups are so broad with many factions.

Show thread

"All in All, Another Brick in the Motte"

slatestarcodex.com/2014/11/03/

"[The motte-and-bailey fallacy] draws its strength from people's usual failure to debate specific propositions rather than vague clouds of ideas."

This isn't even the main point of the essay but it succinctly captures something I've noticed for a long time, and it's basically why I can't really align myself with any broad sociopolitical (?) movement.

"I don’t like Kiwi Farms at all... But as loath as I may be to say it, Kiwi Farms is far more harmless than their enemies on Twitter and in the media would have you believe. They are the simple side of this battle. Keffals, on the other hand…"

"Suicide-by-Kiwi-Farms." by Taylor Stuckey in Default Wisdom defaultfriend.substack.com/p/s

"The core message I'm going for is that 'universal' debt forgiveness is not universal. It benefits people who took out student loans at the expense of everyone who didn't take out student loans, privileging a class who are disproportionately likely to be privileged and telling the rest to suck it up and be happy for them."

"Anger At Student Loan Cancellation Is Justified" by TracingWoodgrains tracingwoodgrains.substack.com

It's days like these I'm actually glad I don't actively check my Twitter feed.

If there's one thing I've learned, it's that I'm definitely not ardently progressive or leftist. And sometimes I wonder how my my moderate positions would be taken in some circles. (I can honestly imagine people picking apart my post about the SCOTUS ruling in Dobbs because I said was only "cautiously" pessimistic about its ramifications.)

"Clear communication is difficult... I am only sometimes good at it, but a major piece of what makes me sometimes good at it is described below in concrete and straightforward terms."

"Ruling Out Everything Else" by Duncan_Sabien on Less Wrong lesswrong.com/posts/57sq9qA3wu

I've been trying to write something with my thoughts about COVID-19 safety policies (mainly inspired by the the debates I witnessed around the policies for fan conventions I'm attending this year, but applicable more broadly) but it always just feels like a disjointed collection of thoughts on disparate issues.

US politics 

Watching the reaction to ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization overturning and I'll say I'm cautiously pessimistic about the ramifications. Also watching what comes of Justice Thomas's concurrence re other major decisions that may be reconsidered.

Next step would be of course to campaign against restrictive state laws prohibiting esp. provisions prohibiting travel to other states for abortions (or federal legislation preventing this?).

To be fair, Orac does acknowledge the possibility as part of a comment: "I suppose it’s theoretically possible to be provaccine but antimandate, but I’m struggling to recall the last time that I’ve encountered one." Which is basically the same as how I feel.

Show thread

It's not because I agree with that libertarian sort of position, but rather because I think there needs to be a genuine political debate informed by the science, not a scientific debate in a political arena.

Also, it means one side can claim to be "pro-science" and advocate for particular policies under that banner, while portraying other policies as "anti-science," even though the disagreement is (or ought to be) a political one.

Same thing happens with climate change.

Show thread

"How to identify most antivaxxers with a simple question" by Orac in Respectful Insolence respectfulinsolence.com/2022/0

Good post but the header image (with a person holding a sign reading, "I'm not Anti-Vaccine; I'm anti-Mandate") bothers me, because I genuinely wish the position of, "Vaccines are generally good and you should get them unless you have a medical condition that precludes it, but they shouldn't be mandated," was more prominent.

"My first impressions of web3" by Moxie Marlinspike moxie.org/2022/01/07/web3-firs

"People don’t want to run their own servers, and never will." I think this is a fundamental principle to keep in mind when trying to create decentralized systems on the Internet.

I previously expressed annoyance at the fact that Linktree, a site for creating a Web page with links to other sites, exists as a commercial service ( qoto.org/@collectedoverspread/ ) but I recognize that this is just that principle at work. Still, it still bothers me how even simple things are now being placed on other people's servers because of this.

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.