One thing disappointing about the is that there are very few instances that don't ban "hate speech". The is often painted as a decentralized free-speech utopia, yet most instances ban hate speech.

The frankly is better suited for developing safe spaces than true free speech online, where you can say anything you want, and anybody can read what you say.

@realcaseyrollins I don't see the fact that people want to avoid untrammeled speech as a problem -- we are all here in seach of different things, and conflict is not on most people's lists of reasons to be here.

I like the fact that there are different places and you can visit and see, find nice local feeds to chat more closely with people.

It only would take a few storm troopers determined to make havoc to disturb things a lot if there were no controls or doors to stop them. State sponsored actors included.

@design_RG Oh yes, quite true! Rules against harassment are necessary.

Perhaps it is unreasonable to expect everyone to want to engage with people from all viewpoints.

Follow

@realcaseyrollins Most of the time people come looking for a social experience, discovering new things, learning and having a nice time in their limited spare time.

So avoiding unwanted content or conflict is important to most people, I think. For a long time I avoided Twitter for this and other reasons (their brain dead 140 characters limit was also so stupid as to defy my comprehension, to be perfectly honest)

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.