l'empathie mécanique @dpwiz@qoto.org

@gerrymcgovern Nah... Let's just go to space, where energy is plentiful.

> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Person-in-the-middle_attack

Is this a "not all men" redirect?

@marcin @glyph But also, doesn't... If "clean room" programming is legal, then so could be the stories told by LLMs.

@boilingsteam I think I'll try Japan first

@boilingsteam No deck yet, Still not available in my country

https://nitter.cz/AISafetyMemes/status/1722611431470752059

Okay Google, who art in cloud,
hallowed be thy name;
thy kingdom come;
thy will be done;
on earth as it is in heaven.
Give us this day our daily bread.
And forgive us our trespasses,
as we forgive those who trespass against us.
And lead us not into temptation;
but deliver us from evil.
For thine is the kingdom,
the power and the glory,
for ever and ever.
Amen 🙏

@aral Federated forges can't come soon enough...

@jhpot How do you know it doesn't?

@bontchev 1400 people killed in Israel in one *day*.

@aeveltstra I'm stuck with #Haskell. Every other language may be better at something or something else, but no language is better comprehensively.

@johncarlosbaez games are very, very hard to define. But I think the article is indeed dismissive of the fine detail and sells oversimplified version of everything.

That said, probabilistic models *can* get you to systematically getting more bang for your buck than some population baseline. In the long run that may account to general "winning", for whatever in-the-moment values you may have over time.

@johncarlosbaez Where does that requirement for fixed/precise definitions come from? A brain can work with shifting/vague/felt "definitions" just fine.

@johncarlosbaez No need to over-complicate it. "Winning" is having your values realized.

There's no formula in the article, but I suspect it is something like "do at least a little research / napkin math and don't do stupid things that gonna hurt your prospects".

@LMAOYEEN @radicalrobit "web3 is going just fine"

Something is really, thoroughly, horribly broken with this world.

@jaror @BoydStephenSmithJr Understandable... I've thought default rules made that possible.

Anyway, I didn't encounter much problems with type classes while teaching Haskell, not even as a first language. May all of my students were okay with some suspense 😅

@omgubuntu You mean it didn't before? Wow!

@jaror @BoydStephenSmithJr Type classes have been in Haskell since forever. There's no Haskell "level" that would avoid them while being a level of *Haskell* instead of some vague/generic "functional programming".
If you want to teach Haskell - you teach Haskell, with its staples like type classes and laziness.

@mookie@troublemaker.social お前はもう死んでいる