My own hypothesis is that the harmful thing is "engagement maximization" and not "social media", and that you could have engagement-maximization algorithms applied to other things and make them more harmful, but I don't have hard data to support that and I don't really even know how to start going about gathering it, or falsifying this hypothesis.
@travisfw I've seen a lot of humongous illegible diagrams that could have been a few lines of code. If there's a tool to make it legible, I don't know about it.
I'm not against no-code or something. It is visual coding that makes my eyes hurt.
@travisfw IDK. Visual "code" doesn't scale well. Text is more succinct and easier to pattern-match.
@omgubuntu Th[e]Underbird
@travisfw No-code for what result?
I acquired (with help) a killer audio cassette digitizing rig, and then IMMEDIATELY had to spend over 2 months digitizing 90+ cassettes from the 1999 Game Developers Conference (via a slow-and-steady workflow that got the job done without being too disruptive to any other work I was doing).
So, here we are, it's done. Go enjoy 70+ hours of presentations about all aspects of game making and producing, in 1999.
https://archive.org/details/1999_Game_Developers_Conference_Audio
@boilingsteam SmertTV - a romantic pale of death by consumption
Looks like this is the reason why Opus, the next-gen Xiph codec, was failed to overtake its predecessor Vorbis despide being pareto-superior to it.
The author of `stb_vorbis.h` that gets shipped far and wide found that they can't make the same for Opus due to licensing shenanigans.
https://nothings.org/stb/stb_opus.html
@me Twitter-to-OPML? Yes, please.
alcohol
@webbureaucrat Hm... That's almost exactly* the thing that made me read it in a first place.
*Mixed with shipping Python code at 2 AM.
@jonn I vaguely remember something like this. Care to post the link again?
But, isn't snowballing is the essence of strategy? Press the advantage while you can, so you can "can" later too 😄
@whitequark Walled by a sign-up form. Great start, just great...
@reidrac@social.sdf.org @gilesgoat I use TabNine with a moderate success.
It doesn't pretend to be "your smart coding assistant" and literally a glorified autocomplete.
But it is hit-or-miss even with that. Sometimes it completes too much or picks up a wrong pattern. Sometimes I miss something that it got wrong and had to backtrack. Luckily it is only a line-sized chunk of code, not some "write me a screenful of boilerplate".
So it is net-positive, but marginally so.
Perhaps its main value for me is having a live probe in the state of the art free::beer code automation. If the thing starts to pump solid Haskell I'd be worried... or happy, IDK.
@gilesgoat @reidrac@social.sdf.org Coding in Python, JS or other popular language (i.e. where LLMs achieved network effect) is basically automating yourself away (as a coder) by pouring more data in their programming corpus.
If you like code and don't like debugging others' mindless slapdash - avoid mainstream. It is already doomed by its success.
Toots as he pleases.