@anornymorse
Its a specific form of Libertarianism which believes there is a need for the government but said need should be minimized to a handful of key areas.

@gunkslinger @Liberty4Masses

@freemo @liberty4masses @gunkslinger You kids are funny, redefining libertarianism like that.

Seems Project Mockingbird was a success.

@anornymorse Agreed, i find it silly. Libertarianism is basically any view that seeks to minimize governement. Beyond that there are as many flavors as you want really.

@freemo
> Gets called a mockingbird puppet for redefining libertarianism.
> goes ahead and redefines it *again*.

Humans need a debugger, stat.

@anornymorse I'm not sure using the same definition as has been accepted for several decades now counts as "redefining it"

@freemo
> Says same definition has been around for "several decades"
> Isn't even old enough to remember two decades.

Thanks for the laugh.

@anornymorse What does the fact that the definition is older than you matter? Or did you mean me, cause you have no idea how old I am.

@freemo @anornymorse this whole conversation is stupid, theres like 30 different specified definitions for libertarianism and as simply a word its majorly abstract, for example for 40 years anarcho-syndicalist have taken to calling themselves libertarian socialist to express their views on personal intersocial control that often takes place within traditional socialist countries
@a7 @freemo

I'm being flooded by 20yo's telling me about history. Help.
@a7 @freemo The best part? "Libertarian socialist" was never even a thing more than 10 years ago. And now every commie faggot tries to use it to join the Free State project, and wonders why anyone older than 30 calls them mockingbird meat-puppets.
@orekix @a7 @freemo Yes, show me more pictures of literally-whos. That's totally not an Authority Fallacy.

@orekix @a7 @anornymorse @gunkslinger

This is all quite amusing. I feel like gary reliving the debate in some nonsensical parody of itself:

youtu.be/ZITP93pqtdQ

@freemo @orekix @a7 @anornymorse
So how do you fund this government of yours without violating people's rights? What is the point of libertarianism in your mind if it does not uphold people's rights?

@gunkslinger
Depends my system wouldnt really be purely any model. But most of the ways I'd resolve that is simply to make governments opt-in.You choose what government you want to be a part of (the details behind this are complex) or no nation at all. Therefore you choose which tax/reward scheme you want as a result.

But how such a system works would take a while to deep dive on.

@orekix @a7 @anornymorse

@anornymorse
I never claimed it to be a minarchism or even any other form of libertarianism. So no.

@orekix @gunkslinger @a7

@freemo @anornymorse @orekix @a7
>I never claimed it to be a minarchism or even any other form of libertarianism. So no.

LOL!

Follow

@gunkslinger
A minarchism, by definition, represents the state as being, you guessed it, minimal. Usually covering just the night-watch needs. I made no claim that state need be minimal. Thus minarchism does not apply here.

@anornymorse @orekix @a7

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.