So would seem that recently Sunbeamcity.com has stated that their administrative position is to support and protect doxxing when they deem it appropriate.
This puts people at real danger especially considering the poor reputation the person doing the doxxing has (a laundry list of false accusations with no evidence).
The question I want to ask, should the QOTO policy be updated t include a clause where we defederate from any instance that supports doxxing?
Vote if you'd like but ultimately the comments will decide where I stand on the issue.
#Mastoadmin #Fediblock #Mastodon
@design_RG I just dug a little deeper, While I cant find the actual post where they stated that doxing is acceptabe I did find that the person who did the doxing is actually a moderator on SBC in the first place. So a bit of a moot point. I think it should be clear that despite what their wiki says considering their moderator is actively engaging in doxxing we can assume its a supported tactic of the instance.
I am all for trying to contact them first, many people have tried, by all means give it a go. They hat eme so best you do it.
I could be wrong but I was under the impression DK has been the mod of SBC for a long time now.
@igeljaeger @freemo @crunklord420 @design_RG @khird nyanasexual, it means my sex life consist entirely of cooming to neko lolis
That would depend on the internal structure of the server, generally yes.
Several people hae reached out to the admin, but because the moderator who is doxxing people also has severeal hundred servers blocked they cant actually hear anything from anyone who messages them. They long since blocked anyone who would even think of disagreeing with them.
Keep in mind the mod doxxing and DDoSingh has been attacking people liberally for a long time now and does it via public toots. I am confident it isnt secret to the admin.
@freemo @design_RG admin is a step up from mod, right? Has anyone tried getting in touch with the actual admin and getting him to clamp down on his rogue mod?