the question whether covid19 vaccine is suspiciously containing a chip or not is always important topic to be asked. And I see the reasonable attitude of us to be wary of this, because it's already exist the technology of implanting chip in this era. and if this does screwed you up, who will guarantee? it's no different to eat nuclear bread unknowingly and get 10 millions dollar of justice which doesn't pay anything.
and if hypothetically it's true and the effect seen ten years afterwards, we can see the caste system imposed on us. there'll be difference of service to those who vaccinated (also proof that they're stupid) and those who're not. This is social credit score --forced. and not to mention if the vaccine actually reducing your body quality, I mean georgia stone is no longer a conspiracy right?
aaah there's an old saying : better to die, than living tortured. and there's also saying better fight to the death, than letting our descendants living as a slaves. 
and will our government failing us?
is there anyone explaining this to them?
while we're vaccinated they just then wet-dreaming enjoying themself as newly established technocratic class by not-chip-vaccinated? 
🇳🇱
LOL I assume this was meant as a joke, that is how I took it.
@freemo
this 'vaccination agenda' or this video as general?
@blinkwarp The idea that the covid vaccine could seriously be a means to insert a chip into people, for example... the Conspiracy Theory nuttery basically.
@freemo @blinkwarp
> conspiracy nuttery basically
Agreed.
While I generally have a huge distaste for conspiracy theories there are the absolute nutty ones and then ones where im like "well that is possible but there is still no evidence and it would be hard to pull off"... this one is just nutty...
There are so many limitations and even fundamental laws of phsyics, that make this impossible... If there is a chip then you would see it in the liquid, the conspiracy wouldnt get so far.
If it were nanobot microscopic shit they would be impossible to communicate on RF as their antenna would be far too small to be able to communicate on any useful frequency. The smaller the antenna the less effective it is at a given frquency, specifically those at wavelenths above the antenna size. So to be small enough to be unable to be seen by the naked eye means they are too small to act as a chip in anyway.
The reason its so laughable as an idea is because even if there was, somehow, the unbelievable cooperation of people en masse to make this possible, it STILL wouldnt be possible.
We are in flat earth territory here.
@freemo
> nutty
Downright insane for my taste.
> there are so many limitations . . . so far.
Ikr!
> if it were nanobot microscopic . . . in anyway
That too. I forgot to mention that on my comments.
> we are in flat earth teritory here
Can't agree more sir.
@blinkwarp