#SCOTUS says it made a mistake with Roe and it is fixing its mistake.
If a court takes 50 years to correct a mistake, that court probably shouldn't exist.
@Pat I dunno,changing things after 50 years or more and trying to fix the past is generally a good thing.
In this case however it is debatable if they fixed a mistake as opposed to making one. Personally I dont think the court ever had the right to make the ruling in the first place, but we should have had this codified in an amendment instead.
If the court makes a mistake, then they should correct it immediately. And if the mistake is a long-stand precident, then it should be corrected by the people via Congress enacting law or by constitutional amendment, not arbitrarilly by scotus.
@Pat
Prior to roe v wade the long standing precedence was that there were no legal protectiona for abortion. So by your logic you oppoaes roe v wade since scotus shouldnt be changing long standing precedence.
@Pat
Yes agreed congress is a mess and they arent living up to their reaponsibility of addressing this. Id happily support a ammendme t which gives limited protection to abortions. Not sure basi g it on liberty alone is going to cut it as liberty is enumerated in the constitution and doesnt include abortions sadly.