STEM is focuses on everything else mostly. not human beings and their feelings.

Is that quite correct? (on first look)

That's the TLDR -

:rocket Please boost and comment if I'm wrong or right to get good comments... :rocket

TLDR 2:

#STEM / #Science #Tech #Engineering #Maths is mostly not orientated or considerate of people themselves or their feelings - during or after 'work' (neither the workers who do work or what the work is effecting upon others).

@freemo I've mentioned you here because I feel like you have a good reply for the above distinction (the rest is just extra below but helps give micro-reasons that make the total premis).

Please boost and comment if I'm wrong or right...

I aim to correct as I go or realise why it's ok to ignore people and focus on Tech / STEM... as it seems to be proven or felt already that there is a quick limit to all tech and we reached there around the 2000's ! :)

====================

Further points are "" marked:

The post is here because:

1) if things are not for or with them (workers / those effected) in mind then that is a bigger problem than calculating the material things correctly unless really good work is done prior.

2) I do care more than the average modern person it seems... about people... and because THEN it solves everything a lot better - even the material world can be solved but not without the people.

(i.e. NOT considering people is almost always worse / ignorant / feeding colder people / bastards / #Musk)

I'm painting STEM it seems with 1 brush...
BUT if you agree "STEM" itself is a grouped term of similar brushes quite deliberately similar because they do not include the people stuff first (or at all) then that similarly find that critical and a direct result of the problems and perspectives of that.

IF doing anything human orientated and anything to do with humans / humanity then those people's thoughts or even participation is needed in some way / level. Never near-0%.
IF it was much high like 50% then I could accept it a lot more.

Not being too extreme here but
when it's near-0 caring or cutting people out and treating them as blank pawns, then THIS IS a human problem FROM those kinds of perspective and faulty as a human result (might make sense as maths or tax but not for people and the right reasons at all).

Often STEM can HIDE people-related problems as a result of cutting it out (Africa's extracted metals, technological targeting etc)

So results can be false without the human voice or for very wrong reasons.

Another way to say it
without #individualisation, people are counted the same.
The next bean increment is counted are exactly the same as the previous bean / human. 1...12,13...222... treating people as objects.

STEM is more of a #topdown perspective 1) financially and 2) as work practices internally and treats people themselves as objects.

"1" = same "1"?
To represent 1 person and the next as the same isn't quite right.

To represent 1 person in mostly 1 way as object-orientated design is generally not great ...

(Do tell me if a number or tax code represents you well (!) )

All your attributes and other "values" that you feel can be mostly cut off / skipped / is not important)

Computers can have correct results or but not at all for humans betterment / consent / consideration

STEM are good or ok-ish...
...for computer-computer design and things without a soul

but

...it's a problem for
computer-to-human-to-computer-back-to-human design

STEM is focussed mostly on everything else apart from human beings and their feelings.

and sometimes the whole point is lost as a result (such as social not being generally "social" or leaving it up to people who don't know how to socialise / make a real movement of change)

The effects are mostly done unto others rather than the "how do people feel about it at the time". The human factor and feelings at the time or later is largely missing / not part of the calculation or checking. It's more a material thing...

This makes a perfect tool skipping how people feel - both those calculating and those having the calculation done TO THEM.

STEM doesn't calculate or even deliberately likes to ignore the people doing the work or who it's done on... it's just done or expected or even demanded without more checks with the people. Similar to how aboriginal people and colonial mentality just say "ok now you're doing this" as a command (and conquer).

I think that's why STEM acronym are a group of only THOSE TYPES of tools because everyone wants to cut out how people feel.

If someone doesn't want to do it or has different feelings it's obviously more political (which is why people think Tech is not political but it just skips it a lot of the time).

Please boost if I'm wrong or right...

Said because I care a bit more about people I guess... and that is usually not the most popular state given job (to care) or individually chosen way... Hmmm... #FreeSchool