The flood of #enshittification that #Broadcom unleashed upon #VMware and its customers after acquiring it, and its seismic waves in the whole IT supply chain, are a testament of how bad managers who seek for short-term revenue hikes without thinking of the long-term are walking ticking bombs for the tech industry.

https://www.theregister.com/2026/01/15/dell_vmware_claim_tesco_case/

We all know what Broadcom did to VMware after acquiring it. VMware was turned overnight into Broadcom’s cash cow, they hiked prices by 3x in some cases, scrapped perpetual licenses, forced all customers into more expensive subscriptions, said that they only wanted to focus on the most profitable customers and fuck everyone else, all while worsening customer support and providing literally zero added value and features to the product.

Basically a parasitic acquisition solely focused on sucking all the vital lymph out of another product - pure Oracle textbook.

When you play such stunts with individual customers, unfortunately, it works most of the times. Individuals don’t have much leverage, nor choice if there is too much concentration in a certain market. They may complain, but often they swallow the bitter bite.

Things are different when you play them in huge corporate products that are an integral part of the IT infrastructure we all use.

It turns out that among the businesses who were disgruntled when Broadcom suddenly cancelled their VMware perpetual licenses there was Tesco.

But Tesco didn’t acquire VMware licenses directly from Broadcom, of course. They acquired them through a reseller of hardware and software licenses - Computacenter. So Tesco sued them instead for failing to provide them the licenses that they were contractually bound to provide.

Computacenter, on its hand, didn’t acquire VMware licenses directly either. They were provided with the Dell servers they sold, as Dell was an authorized VMware reseller. So Computacenter sued Dell.

Dell, on its hand, says that it has no fault if Broadcom has suddenly changed VMware’s pricing model, and that they are the ones who broke contracts with the whole downstream supply chain. So Dell sued Broadcom.

And there we go. A chain of 3 lawsuits between 4 giants across the whole IT supply chain in order to call a parasitic company accountable.

What a mess. But I guess that the manager who proposed to squeeze annual recurring revenue got his/her fat quarterly bonus home after things seemed to work for the first year.

This is also your daily reminder that as a sysadmin you must use only FOSS products supported by the community and by strong foundations - and contribute back to them once their success becomes your success too.

Enough with the “but stability - but support - but licenses - but my manager” corporate bullshit.

The cost of writing your own little qemu CI/CD pipeline to spin up your virtual machines is much lower than the risk of your corporate subscription getting suddenly enshittified by chains of wrong financial incentives at any place in your upstream supply chain, and having to spend years of tears on expensive long-chain lawsuits.

And, even if things go bad, the cost of migrating out of proprietary and non-standard implementations is usually much higher than the cost of migrating to a compatible fork.

Follow

Not suprised - Eventually happens to everyone + everthing unless we work away from 'system' (of cheating people / profit)... AND ALSO developing people more than just Tech to solve human greed... 

@fabio Without reading it all - I'll take a guess - it's the same happening to EVERYONE in this industry who constantly is surprised at the WHOLE MODEL being a kind of / trick itself - either now or eventually when bad people get round to pulling their pants down also.

and devaluing itself at root on every loan given out (the whole pool of money goes down) etc and somehow people don't "see" it what's happening or that it goes around to them eventually when happening it's over and over elsewhere? Dumb...

All that description seems fine but it's MISSING the overall scam / trick / pressure of us passing around (or whatever the same) and MONEY ITSELF being a scam AND THEN also others yes with THEIR short-term scam-syndrome (greed or stupidity or shooting self in foot).

EXPECT EVERYTHING LIKE THIS - AS A SOFT OF HARD ON PEOPLE.

What you describe as selling things / parasitic etc is also unfortunately the problem (even the luke warm versions), so while people think "I have to stay alive / do something" selling your planet catches up with everyone / selling your body to unethical people using unethical money etc is just too much bad work fast... just have to get out of this accepting fall-out.

ourselves short is not fun for you or next ...

Don't wait for it to happen again we have to THINK ABOUT USING something else that doesn't take from our# future and / everything from the past of generations who did or didn't know what they were doing to the children of the future using debt and control points to constrain / sterilise them / all .

Seems perhaps unrelated but isn't - long and short chains all count and come back to the same money used for (neutrally said too, that's just what money was made for, war!).
The financial is deadly. ☠️ ☣️ 🛢️ :nes_fire:

And IT / many working people are part of that "industry" as soft war (software) or hard war (hardware) when a lot of money goes to states
....until they / we look for another way almost separate from "system" / cheating numbers often and many mechanisms we give to almost without thought).

⬇️ Think again about ⬇️
Developing better people is needed even more than developing more /

⬅️ hashtag

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.