Show newer

What do you mean when you say a student "learned" the material?

It is puzzling that we are concerned with principles of when designing for but not for

Especially in is the process of building capacity. Capacity is necessarily flexible, adaptable, dynamic.

Meaningful requires renegotiation of what leaner "knows," otherwise previous misconceptions return.

We are learning how brains work. Dewey & Vygotsky were right. Can we please start making sensible decisions?

Valid conclusions come only when data collection and instruments are open to analysis.

Ever notice the simplest solution is the best? I hate it when I forget that.

Designers of attend to tasks, individuals' needs, social context. All three are relevant to successful design.

When we reduce human cognition to that which can be easily measured, we loose what is most important.

Motivation & consciousness are relevant to understanding activity esp. in

Designing IT for schools? Make it usable and useful, otherwise don't bother.

What if we designed to promote success rather than avoid failure?

How do we separate fact, from informed opinion, from speculation?

"Stuff just happens, and rarely on schedule." Yup gotta agree with Rushkoff on this one.

"That which grows under moderate pressure becomes stronger." D'Arcy Thompson observed this of living systems. Applies to brains also.

One must respect the consultant who says "you are public school teachers, so you know about that than I."

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.