Show newer

Empirical evidence. This is what differentiates science from other types of knowledge.

Writing and content generation are different things. One creates something worth reading, the other fills pages.

The longer I work in education, the less confidence I have in the testing we use as a meaningful instrument for… well anything other than filling time and causing stress.

I saw a performance recently in which teachers were portrayed as uncaring. A colleague who knows my background asked, “wasn’t that unfair to teachers?” I responded, “No. It accurately reflected a significant part of the teacher population in with embarrassing accuracy.”

What if we ask folks to add to our culture, not fit into it?

I’m old enough to remember when we were advised to avoid Cliff Notes and other summaries. Now they are encouraged to have AI summarize books. Is any of this different from researchers using abstracts to get a sense of the article?

“Accepting assumptions” isn’t the same as “having faith.” Assumptions are to be challenged and changed; faith is not.

Access to information isn’t a problem. Curating it, analyzing it, interpreting it, evaluating it, applying it, creating with it are the tasks that should occupy learners’ time today.

Hey students… the existence of the notes doesn’t matter. The thinking you do when you read/ listen and summarize then write it down… that thinking is what matters. Don’t be fooled by the advice to “have AI take your notes.”

“The data are messy and complicated.” Yeah, it might not be easy to analyze, but that’s where the good stuff is lurking.

Shouldn’t all cognition that happens outside the brain & body be called artificial intelligence? I believe it should, and the history of these technologies give us a view if the future once the hype over generative AI is over.

You get to the end of the course you are teaching and students conclude it was a waste of time. How do you respond?

We do lots of things to structure tasks for learning. If you can’t fade those supports over time, then they failed.

Imagine if our learning outcomes were curiosity, creativity, critical thinking, and similar skills and habits.

Those who rage against the current generation forget what was said about them.

It is strange to me that so much of school is grounded in the assumption that students are incapable of learning unless it is specifically taught and graded.

The most ethical people update their “rules” as things change.

When you record grades to tenths, you demonstrate you don’t understand grading.

Unpopular opinion: All flags are designed to exclude people.

According to the biography of Albert Einstein, he graduated from one school with a 4.25 in math on a scale that went to 6. I can hear the question in the teacher meeting… “So what was his real grade?”

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.