Show newer

@Umbr4R3d @ChristophB @garyackerman I guess there is something wrong with the testing regime as well. Students/pupils should be allowed to demonstrate their skills and competencies in ways that makes this whole scenario go away.

The Turing Test poisoned the minds of generations of AI enthusiasts, because its criteria is producing text that persuades observers it was written by a human.

The result? Generative AI text products designed to "appear real" rather than produce accurate or ethical outputs.

It *should* be obvious why it's problematic to create a piece of software that excels at persuasion without concern for accuracy, honesty or ethics. But apparently it's not.

Someone just said this and I think I'm going to tattoo it on my arm:

"Don't give up, but don't waste time. "

Is it inconsistent for a company to claim it "takes your security seriously" when it limits the punctuation marks allowed in passwords?

“Every kid starts out as a natural-born scientist, and then we beat it out of them. A few trickle through the system with their wonder and enthusiasm for science intact.”

— Carl Sagan

#quote #CarlSagan

When you recognize contingency and randomness affect all decisions an outcomes you are beginning to be qualified to be a leader.

@margreta @garyackerman I wonder if the situation I characterise here: davelane.nz/explainer-digitech also applies where you are... I suspect it's fairly universal, and it's a very big elephant in the room.

A union has voted “work to rule,” so folks have been declining invitations to committee meetings. While I’m no longer in the union, I fully support the decision.
I do have to convince colleagues that suggesting, “I’ll get your input in an individual meetings” is really not an appropriate response to those who skip extra committee work as part of collective action.

If you post, “research shows,” but you don’t reference it, I assume you are making it up.

“If I didn’t see it with my own eyes” is not the critical stance you think it is.

I ended up back in the classroom near the end of my k-12 career. I pushed back on all of the silly practices recommended by instructional coaches, and I shared research articles and my supporting my “push back.” They were happy to see me finally retire.

I met with a faculty member to “fix my gradebook” in the LMS. It became clear immediately the instructor had no idea what they was asking their students to to this term. No wonder students were confused.

The degree to which flexibility characterizes effective classrooms is overlooked in my opinion.

If you can’t tell me what’s wrong with your plan, I’m not going to trust what you say is right about it.

Look at the curriculum & instruction. If it is grounded in telling and testing, be skeptical of the practitioners. Cognitive and learning science has taught us lots in recent decades, if educators don’t know those lessons, they will be ineffective.

@garyackerman I would add the word “challenge” to “change.” If they (we!) are not challenged, how can we be encouraged to change?

Education is about changing humans. When our students leave our classrooms, we expect they can do things, see things, and think things they could not before the class. If our students leave with their abilities unchanged, then they (and we) have wasted their time and energy and money while there.

John Dewey wrote education is not preparation for life, it is life itself. While this may be true, many students enroll in higher education to be better prepared for the profession they will enter after they graduate. It seems reasonable, then, that educators should take steps to ensure their students can use what they learn in the classroom in other settings as well.

I work in IT. I spend all day trying to figure out what people mean in their incomplete and typo-ridden emails.

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.