Friends:
The men, women and children who perished in extermination camps had *lives*. They were grandparents, musicians, rabbis, schoolgirls, craftsmen, mothers, shopkeepers, toddlers, artists. They played, created, dreamed, wondered, wrote, cooked, studied, taught, cared for others, were imperfect, and were loved.
We must not forget them.
@auschwitzmuseum
Hi all, instead of a re- #introduction after moving instances, I'd like to introduce you to my graduate student Peter Salvino, who passed away under tragic circumstances last week.
Because of his way too early passing, most of you didn't get to know him. So I wanted to make sure my #neuroscience community knows how brilliant and kind a scientist he was. Peter wore many hats in the lab. Being my very first student, he built with me, and knew the ins and outs of every bit of hardware and software. He was also a masterful engineer and inventor, and had a keen scientific mind. He knew what the big questions in the field were and was completely fearless in going after them. We will slowly publish all his great contributions, so you will read his name again.
Most importantly, he was so generous to his lab mates. He helped every single person in the lab, with such selflessness and genuine humbleness. He was really loved by all of us. This is such a huge loss to our field. He was destined to greatness.
Peter's family has set up a GoFundMe campaign to help support research similar to his at Northwestern. They welcome any contributions to honor the memory of this amazing human being.
@lucaspinto So sorry Lucas. What a tragedy.
@IdahoLark @Flash Kathrin Swoboda https://novanaturephotography.com/
@WiringtheBrain this is what I mean by uncaused causes.
@tdverstynen @WiringtheBrain @NicoleCRust indeterminacy does not rescue free will. The folk notion of free will (that our choices are “uncaused causes”) is incompatible with materialism whether or not the the universe follows the Copenhagen view or superdeterminism. But we can consider a compatiblist notion of free will. Like, it is clear that for some events (like me writing this toot) the most proximal cause of the event is the properties of an organism: I.e. me. I would add a bunch of links… but I’m on my phone and it would be a bunch of work. :)
@jerlich Re writings: this is a gentle introduction to my view of consciousness https://www.philosophersmag.com/essays/222-the-lure-of-the-cartesian-sideshow
This recent lecture is also fairly accessible:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qfUPucMNvJE
@NicoleCRust @albertcardona @matthewcobb
One of the things I've been struggling with recently is how the vast majority of papers (including most or arguably all of mine) don't propose an idea that could in principle get us closer to understanding how the brain does what it does. I have the feeling that there was this moment in time when people were coming up with tons of crazy theories. They were all wrong (probably) but it was exciting. Now we're just talking about how many dimensions a 'neural manifold' has and I just can't get excited about that (sorry manifold people). In my case, I think I've had a small handful of ideas that went in the direction I'd like neuroscience to be going in of proposing ideas that could scale to part of a full explanation of the brain, but I haven't pursued them because they were hard to define or get funding for. My resolution for 2023 is to focus more on those interesting questions and less on things that I think are easy to get published or get funding. For what it's worth, the biggest challenge to neuroscience I reckon is how it can operate in a stable way based on what seems to be a surprisingly unstable substrate (e.g. synaptic turnover). If I had a good idea about how to solve that problem, that's what I'd be working on.
@techladylaura I don’t understand why this matters. Twitter is filled with bots and trolls. Of course some of those are government run.
@tnarock depends on your field. And your goals. We use zenodo to get a DOI for a specific git repo release. We recently used https://gin.g-node.org/ based on a recommendation.
Wow, this is an amazing shortcut to understanding mixed (aka multilevel, hierarchical ...) models, both conceptually and with applications: https://m-clark.github.io/mixed-models-with-R/ #rstats #statistics #methods
I wrote a tribute to Chuck Stevens, an incredible scientist who passed away recently. I was fortunate to work with, and learn from, him over the years. I will deeply miss him. https://www.cell.com/neuron/fulltext/S0896-6273(22)01074-1
@empiricism did you read the article? It’s worth a read. The quote in the toot is a bit out of context but makes point that anyone can start a journal and claim that they do peer review which undermines the concept of peer review.
@keithfrankish thanks. A good read. I tend to agree that is is no Cartesian sideshow or theatre. But it’s still deeply mysterious how / why some things rise to conscious awareness and other things do not. Is there one control system in particular that generates awareness?
'Why some animals can regenerate while many others cannot remains a fascinating question. Even amongst planarian flatworms, well-known for their ability to regenerate complete animals from small body fragments, species exist that have restricted regeneration abilities or are entirely regeneration incompetent. Towards the goal of probing the evolutionary dynamics of regeneration, we have assembled a diverse live collection of planarian species from around the world.'
@alicia_izquierdo welcome!
@keithfrankish do you have some writing on the topic(s) for non-philosophers ?
I had the opportunity to go to a workshop run by Birch at LSE. Seems to me that they have a very clear goal in studying sentience: a sentient being Carries more weight in moral calculations. For the record, I support improving animal welfare, in particular in factory farming. Is your thinking about sentience and life also guided by ethical concerns?
@jerlich It's more that I think we need to reconceptualize sentience, as we reconceptualized life