I kind of want a forest cabin now, to be honest.
I feel that. The implementation backlog just keeps growing.
Ah nice. I have a lambda at the begining of my prompt too.
Mine are white underlined. Reject authority!
I think they lowered the caffeine amount. I tried 3 pieces at once and felt basically nothing. ![]()
Also yikes, my phones are always sub 200.
Even my personal laptop is like 100 USD.
I could make a mini supercomputer for 1k USD.
What are these people paying for? Hardware space for Apple's botnet?
@barrett love the growing insect eye
Although I get why Haskell wants Pure FP. And, for theorem provers it makes a lot more sense.
Haskell's selling point is to be default lazy. This enforces pure FP and basically all of its other quirks. Laziness was popular in the programming language research community because it has a lot of fun properties.
But, I am surprised just as anyone that Haskell is sold as a general programming language. Resource constraints, and programmers that do not like the extra complexity and math are obvious problems for it.
Pure FP is like the "everything is an object" fanatisism Oracle tried to push with Java.
Regular FP seems pretty okay though. Racket seems like it let's you do just about anything you want.
Lol ![]()
I am pretty curious about how to use automated reasoning systems to help discover new things, use and verify old ideas, and generally make my life easier.
Current events I try to keep up on
- Math Logic community (The Journal of Symbolic Logic)
- Statistics community (JASML, AoS)
- Algebra community (JoA, JoAG, JoPaAA, SIGSAM)
- Formal Methods community (CAV/TACAS)
Passing the learning curve up to current events
- Abstract Algebra (Dummit, Foote)
- Commutative Algebra (Eisenbud)
- Algebraic Geometry (Hartshorne)
- Mathematical Logic (Mendelson)
- Model Theory (Marker)