josemanuel @josemanuel@qoto.org

@marine Real.

@mahaska It's ok. I was being sarcastic in my original post anyway.

@trinsec If they want to be the flagship of the Fediverse, we should hold them to a higher standard.

@mahaska I got a DM I didn't want or ask for that came from their instance. They _are_ the bad guys. Any Pleroma or Misskey instance does that and it's erradicated on the spot with no questions asked and no presumption of innocence.

So, mastodon.social spams the whole Fediverse and that's not a clear basis for adding them to #fediblock?

@freemo
> at which point the silence will be removed.

Oh, come on. It's ok. Don't bother.

@aaronareed _Photopia_, that was a good game. I miss _The Cabal_, _Aisle_ or _Chicks Dig Jerks_ in the list, though. Also, _Ad Verbum_.

I just discovered the work of Brain Games (https://braingames.santiontanon.dev/) and I'm speechless. They all look astonishing!

#msx #retrogaming

@orekix Well, at least we know it's not self-conscious yet.

@davidlopez
> Lo que me gusta de este sitio es que solo veo las cosas de la gente que sigo voluntariamente y que no me oculta lo que no le interesa.

Si crees eso, es que no conoces a gargron y tampoco un hashtag llamado #fediblock. Aunque estando en mastodon.art puede que ni siquiera llegues a leer esto.

La instancia importa y mucho. No sólo determina a quién podrás ver y a quién no, sino además cosas tan fundamentales como el límite de caracteres o si puedes usar Markdown o QT.

@bufetalmeida

@mangeurdenuage What language is that manga translated to? I own it in English and it's not like that. I don't have it with me right now, but I believe even the title was different.

@ola Not all free software is made in the US. Even in the English-speaking world, the UK does not agree with the US legislation.

In any case, I don't think most free software would ever be written like that. In a world where people still use #vim and #emacs, why would we ever want an AI system to write our code?

@ola If by AI-aided work, we mean what people do today (i.e., give the program a prompt and tweak the results until it returns something acceptable), my opinion is that copyright should be granted to the person who prompted the machine.

Why? Because the difference between these programs and, say, Krita is the same as that between nano and phpstorm. No matter how much autocompletion and shit it comes packed with. Nobody would say the code is not yours.

@ola Songs, screenplays, comics or scientific papers haven been created by several authors since forever. Royalties may be divided, but authorship cannot. In other words, one can be a co-author, but not an author-in-part.

Look at it this way: if the work were deemed illegal for whatever reason, do you think you'd get a reduced sentence for not being _fully_ the author?

@samcre Bueno, bueno. Tampoco es para tanto. Con la inteligencia artificial se da la turra más o menos cada treinta o cuarenta años. Luego llega el invierno y ya está:

https://wikiless.tiekoetter.com/wiki/AI_winter?lang=en

@ola If a piece of work is not subject to copyright, that means it is in the public domain. But copyright is not the same as authorship, so I suppose one could still defend one's own work against someone else's plagiarism of it, for example. The moral right of the author can never be rescinded.

@lowqualityfacts Is that dude a turtle?

Please, tell that to my boss.