K‮ly‬e @khird@qoto.org

@Tutanota the one between my ears

@trinsec I rescued a textbook from a library that was being dissolved, dated 1953 by a professor at the library's host university. It was "intended for use primarily for students who seek an understanding of physical phenomena and the use of the scientific method as a part of a liberal arts education."

In the chapter Problems of Interplanetary Travel, it has the following to say about propulsion systems: "The maximum energy obtainable from alcohol is its energy of combustion which is 1.37*10^10 ergs/gram. This figure is typical. Although there are other fuels which have a larger energy of combustion, none of these differs from that of alcohol by a factor as much as 10 fold. This figure indicates that we have to start with several grams in order to get one away from the Earth. At its very best, therefore, the energy of chemical combustion is obviously inadequate for space rocketry. It is equally obvious that we must learn how to use nuclear energy for the propulsion of rockets."

With the benefit of hindsight, and the score of successful rocket launches standing at "chemical combustion: a whole lot, nuclear energy: nil", I always thought that paragraph was pretty funny.

@chris_spackman It's in the text of the EO (which I read carefully when it came out). The 14th Amendment applies to people born in the US and "subject to the jurisdiction thereof". Historically that's been read to exclude groups like diplomats, who are an obvious case, being more or less completely immune from the host country's jurisdiction. The EO argues that the named categories of people are not completely "subject to the jurisdiction" of the US, because the countries of their nationality still govern many aspects of their lives. So it comes down to a question of interpretation of that phrase - just because the executive branch says the amendment means X doesn't make it so, and I think that's part of what the courts are being asked to rule on.

@tantramar Looks like a Boeing going by the tail shape, but I'm not good enough at the hobby to tell you what model without a scale reference. Just based on the airport you reported, gonna guess 737 family (and a relatively recent model, looking at the engine proportions and winglet shape) - Columbus is an order of magnitude more populous than Moncton, and we rarely get anything bigger than a 737 or A321. I'd expect to find 777s serving long intercontinental flights and/or connecting major cities.

@tezoatlipoca @paul it's a month and two days - the letter says the cancellation will be effective from the thirtieth of July, not of June. Hope that's enough time to sort them out!

@petersuber see also: posting a song to youtube with the video description saying something like, "I do not own this song. All rights belong to their respective owners - NO COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT INTENDED"

Possible benevolent use case for #deepfake audio tech: news media could train a system on a corpus of a person's utterances in both English and French. Then, when a speech delivered in one language is covered in a segment broadcast in the other, the translation is synthesized in his own voice. I think I'd find that easier to follow than the current practice of having the reporter read it aloud.
#AI #GenAI #Ethics #EthicsInAI #Deepfakes

@mitch the "established history" is that the US treated Japan and Germany pretty much equally, despite the difference in *race*, until the difference in *actions* when Japan attacked Pearl Harbour and (belatedly) declared war. The US gave economic support to their opponents China (Import-Export Bank) and Britain (Lend-Lease Act) to buy American materiel, but military involvement was comparatively limited in both theatres, despite a substantially greater contemporary awareness of the Japanese atrocities at Nanking than the German ones in Poland et al.

There are a number of things one can point to as evidence of racism in America at that point in history, but her entry into WWII really isn't one of them. In fact, one can look back a generation earlier to see that when Germany gave a similar casus belli in the sinking of the Lusitania, the country was certainly willing to go to war against a white enemy if that's who attacked.

I'm not going to question your experience in your family, but I'm reasonably convinced that it doesn't extend to "Usonia, in general" as strongly as your initial post suggests.

@mitch that is certainly a take.

@eclectech "It's good Scottish weather, madam: the rain is falling straight down - well, slightly to the side, like."

@sunflowerinrain it sounds very much like a typo (T and N are adjacent on the us-dvorak layout). It's not a typical usage error here; it's much more common to see "then", which is a near-homophone of "than" in some American pronunciations.

@sunflowerinrain I've never heard "coronated" and "burglarized" only rarely, but one that I do encounter and on which I'd care to hear your opinion: "obligated". Is this a synonym for "obliged", a word with a different meaning, or just an American butchering of the language?

@trinsec IIRC when you click play, you have the option to select format (modern/standard/whatever) and best-of-N, and in that menu there's a "bot match" option with an icon of a quintain.

I haven't played in several months, though - I don't enjoy the deck-building, so every time the set of legal cards changes, I give it up until I feel like making another deck to conform to the new rules.

@mitch sir this is the fediverse, the feziverse is thataway ;-)

@mitch In many ways it's simpler than the American variety - the Commons wields pretty much all the power at the federal level (as opposed to having a president from one party while the other controls Congress) and it all gets elected at the same time (as opposed to having only a third of the American senators stand for election in any presidential cycle). There aren't even any term limits to worry about - as long as the voters are happy enough with you to keep you around, they're allowed to do that.