Show newer
kwitschas boosted

#JuanBurroneLab Interested in doing a postdoc on in vivo imaging of synapse formation and plasticity, in a friendly scientific community and in the heart of London? Check out the link below to apply for a position. jobs.kcl.ac.uk/gb/en/job/05902

kwitschas boosted

RT @AdamIsabella1
The new Isabella lab website is live and lab opening is just around the corner! We are hiring at ALL LEVELS, so anyone interested in studying zebrafish nerve development and regeneration in fun and affordable Minneapolis, please get in touch. isabella-lab.org/

kwitschas boosted

The biggest threat to Twitter under Musk is a multi-platform app that serves Twitter, Mastodon and other services.

Such an app would act as a catalyst for moving to other platforms by lowering the switching cost

I have a scheme for a multi-platform app that Space Elmo can't block. Click on the Twitter feed and it takes you to the Web interface if the API is down.

The client ID will be set to whatever works since my client is built around WebView which is a wrapper around Chrome.

Happy to share this idea with other client developers. My goal is to get people to use end-to-end secure communications, not to have to write the entire client myself.

kwitschas boosted

We came up with 10 New Year's Resolutions that we'd like to improve.

#6 Learn About a Scientific Topic That is Not Your Own

(Stay tuned for the other 4😁)
+ check the previous ones in 🧵below


@OpenAcademics @AcademicChatter

kwitschas boosted
kwitschas boosted

Scientists have discovered a world that is likely rocky and 95% of the size of Earth. The planet, called  TOI 700 e, is orbiting around a star and could have liquid water on it.

cbsnews.com/news/potentially-h

kwitschas boosted

Hey neuromatch people! I just switched to this server in part because I wanted to have more conversations about metascience. So, I read the essay A Vision of Metascience

(scienceplusplus.org/metascienc)

and I have some questions / would love to get pointed in the right direction towards people I can have more conversations with about this stuff.

I liked a lot of the content in this essay, and I really appreciate their effort to stimulate conversations about what alternative social structures for doing science could look like, and to make a plug for diversity in structure that could accommodate/empower, in principle, a broader range of people pursuing a broader range of scientific inquiries. That said, I'm a bit concerned that some of their proposed interventions (which to their credit they don't state would work or would necessarily be societally desirable) would exacerbate rich-get-richer dynamics. (Who do you think would get funding for moonshot proposals?) Much like the crypto/defi movement which partly inspired this essay, without substantial safeguards, I see a small group of currently already influential people (and some possible fraudsters) using new funding opportunities to further consolidate their power, all while touting that they're dismantling the old power structure. But maybe I'm just overly cynical ¯\_(ツ)_/¯.

Wouldn't a simple way to improve creativity/innovation and boost productivity be to move towards a less hierarchical, more egalitarian distribution of resources in science? My understanding is that there is a fairly sound literature (but correct me if I'm wrong) on how happiness boosts creativity, how equal societies are happier on average, and how diversity in leadership may actually support innovation and boost productivity (and isn't *just* morally desirable). I guess I don't see scientists and would-be scientists as having such huge variance in underlying abilities that it could possibly justify the way resources are allocated today. So, I'm wondering if adopting a more egalitarian approach would not only lead to better life outcomes for those of us that love and want to pursue science, but would also enhance and diversify scientific output.

Are there any reviews in the field of metascience that you could recommend that talk more about these types of issues? I just was a bit discouraged that this essay, which was being used to recruit more people into metascience, focused so much on selecting the "right people" to give huge sums of money to, when I believe (perhaps erroneously, but I sincerely hope not) there isn't that much variance in scientists' inherent ability to do good work, just in the extent to which they receive support to pursue that work.

kwitschas boosted

Hello Mastodon! Thank you to everyone who has built this community.

Here is a brief #Introduction. I am a biophysicist. I am best known for:
- my research on liquid-liquid phase separation in biological and model membranes (biophysics.org/bps-bulletin/so), and
- my advice to choose a research field with the fewest assholes (physicstoday.scitation.org/do/)

I am looking forward to learning more about all of you at this site.

kwitschas boosted
kwitschas boosted

The Kitten has commandeered The Kid's hamper and the cuteness level is off the charts 🥰 #catsOfMastodon

kwitschas boosted

Hot take: academia would be significantly better (more creative, stimulant and productive) if, like Poincaré, we all worked just 4 hours a day

RT @adad8m@twitter.com

"[Henri Poincaré] worked regularly from 10 till 12 in the morning and from 5 till 7 in the late afternoon. He found that working longer seldom achieved anything"

🐦🔗: twitter.com/adad8m/status/1613

kwitschas boosted
kwitschas boosted

“The apparent exodus is a shock to the academic system that some researchers didn’t see coming but that others say has been palpable for quite some time — and is a trend only set to continue. ‘The majority of senior academics still don’t understand how fast this is coming,’ says Daniel MacArthur, a population geneticist at the Garvan Institute of Medical Research in Sydney, Australia.

“Early-career scientists are not missing a beat, however.”

nature.com/articles/s41591-022

kwitschas boosted

"There is one obvious way in which human neurons and their dendrites are different from dendrites in, say, cats or rats: they are bigger. However, are these anatomical differences, which alone could change the signal processing capabilities of dendrites [2.,3.], also accompanied by differences in functional properties?"

cell.com/trends/cognitive-scie

kwitschas boosted

RT @quorumetrix
I’ve made this video as an intuition pump for the density of #synapses in the #brain. This volume ~ grain of sand, has >3.2 million synapses (orange cubes). Peeling them away leaves only inputs on 2 #neurons. Zooming in, we see the synapses localized to the dendritic spines.
#b3d

kwitschas boosted

When are we justified in calling mental disorders “brain disorders”?

I discuss Anneli Jefferson's excellent philosophical work on answering this question and offer some thoughts.

#psychiatry #philosophy #psychology #neuroscience

awaisaftab.substack.com/p/when

kwitschas boosted
kwitschas boosted

Kudos to Pam Belluck at the NYT for this opening paragraph - this is the right way to report on a story like lecanemab:

"The Food and Drug Administration on Friday approved a new ’s drug that may modestly slow the pace of cognitive decline early in the disease, but also carries risks of swelling and bleeding in the brain."

nytimes.com/2023/01/06/health/

kwitschas boosted

The PhD is cool and all but it can take a serious toll on your mental health for some.

@OpenAcademics @AcademicChatter

kwitschas boosted
Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.