#phdchat does anyone have advice or resources on starting the introduction for the PhD? I'm doing it by publication, so I need a normal intro literatuatue review chapter & a second part to tie it all up. Feels like a mammoth task and my blank page is looking extremely daunting and empty 🤣. #academicchatter #phd #writing
@gkountourides What I did at the time of my PhD to "initiate" the writing process was to group and organize all of the scientific articles I had read during my PhD into a coherent plan with sections and subsections. I then used this as the plan for my literature review chapter. I find it easier to start writing when you know where you're going and you just have to fill in predefined paragraphs (and it's also practical in therms of scheduling because you can divide the writing into small tasks like "today I write the paragraph on X, tomorrow the paragraph on Y, ...") #academicchatter #phd #writing #phdchat
A great way to start the year: finding that one's work on the neural encoding of noisy whistles by guinea pigs is featured on the front cover of the January issue of the Journal of Physiology!
(The article by Samira Souffi et al. is freely available here https://hal-cnrs.archives-ouvertes.fr/U1120/hal-03853055v1 or behind paywall here https://physoc.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1113/JP283526)
DAGs, Golems, and Owls: Statistical Rethinking 2023 Lecture 1 (of 20). No hard work in this introductory lecture, just a conceptual outline and some dank memes. Lecture 2 later this week introduces Bayesian inference. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FdnMWdICdRs&list=PLDcUM9US4XdPz-KxHM4XHt7uUVGWWVSus&index=1
Raw and post-processed data for the microscopic investigation of the effect of random envelope fluctuations on phoneme-in-noise perception https://zenodo.org/record/7476407#.Y67E3hWZND9
A microscopic investigation of the effect of random envelope fluctuations on phoneme-in-noise perception https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.12.27.522040v1?med=mas
@emkmiller @academicchatter @academicsunite @phdstudents @phdlife @PhD_Genie
3) So I also extract snippets from everything I read, like @jnyrose, and store them in a very large OneNote folder (sorry, I haven't found a suitable alternative) with many entries. I must say this is very satisfying, but I don't know if it is useful: I never had to go back to it to look for all the citations on a specific topic.
@emkmiller @academicchatter @academicsunite @phdstudents @phdlife @PhD_Genie
2) ...So I also keep a spreadsheet of all articles with columns "Authors", "Journal", "Year", but also "Stimulus content", "Task", "Analysis method", etc... The last column is a field "Topic" for which the keywords are organized in a tree to avoid duplicates (http://dbao.leo-varnet.fr/2022/05/20/a-mind-map-of-concepts-in-auditory-speech-perception/). This makes it easier to find a reference when you have only one fragment of memory about it. But to be honest, I think it's mostly useful to force me to organize my thoughts when reading.
However, this is only for article references ...
@emkmiller @academicchatter @academicsunite @phdstudents @phdlife @PhD_Genie
Personally, I use 3 parallel methods to organize and browse the articles/books I read:
1) #Zotero, like many people here. However, I use it mostly to facilitate the creation of bibliographies. However, the metadata system is not flexible enough for my taste...
Another very interesting piece in this museum is the Mini-componium, a replica of the original Componium built by Diederich Nikolaus Winkel in 1821. This remarkable mechanical music instrument can vary the music it plays using a randomizing mechanism! In fact, the Componium creates endless variations on a theme by selecting randomly one of the 8 possible melodies every two measures.
In a sense, this is a very early example of
#ComputerMusic #AlgorithmicComposition
(https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Componium)
(3/3)
#musicbox #music
@pixelfun wow this is cool and unexpected! Cheers
My periodic reminder that my book on the discrete Fourier transforms (incl. FFT, finite fields valued FT, representation theory, and more) is available for free. https://mathematical-tours.github.io/daft/
Another very interesting piece in this museum is the Mini-componium, a replica of the original Componium built by Diederich Nikolaus Winkel in 1821. This remarkable mechanical music instrument can vary the music it plays using a randomizing mechanism! In fact, the Componium creates endless variations on a theme by selecting randomly one of the 8 possible melodies every two measures.
In a sense, this is a very early example of
#ComputerMusic #AlgorithmicComposition
(https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Componium)
(3/3)
#musicbox #music
These music boxes were probably built at the end of the 19th century. An extra feature is the panorama of the horse race in the cabinet. By inserting a coin, the music is played and one can gamble on the winning horse. The machines were designed in such a way that the winning horse could not be predicted with any certainty.
I don't know how it works, but this is maybe one of the earliest random number generator! (2/2)
These music boxes were probably built at the end of the 19th century. An extra feature is the panorama of the horse race in the cabinet. By inserting a coin, the music is played and one can gamble on the winning horse. The machines were designed in such a way that the winning horse could not be predicted with any certainty.
I don't know how it works, but this is maybe one of the earliest random number generator! (2/2)
If you use frequentist statistics, you have to accept that 'no isolated experiment, however significant in itself, can suffice for the experimental demonstration of any natural phenomenon; for the "one chance in a million" will undoubtly occur, with no more or less than it's appropriate frequency, however surprised we may be that it should occur to us.' (Fisher). Replication is a core requirement of all frequentist statistics.
New paper provides a history of “voodoo science,” which discusses the controversy surrounding Vul et al.’s (2009) controversial article “Puzzlingly High Correlations in FMRI Studies of Emotion, Personality, and Social Cognition.”
Five quotes follow: 🧵👉
🔓 https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12010015
#MetaScience
#Neuroscience
#Neuroimaging
#MetaResearch
#PsychMethods
#ReplicationCrisis
#PhilosophyOfScience
#PhilSci
#Fmri
#VoodooCorrelations
#UseNovelty
#MultipleTesting
There’s an absolutely astonishing story brewing in the medieval manuscripts world of a Potemkin Village scholarly institute built out of plagiarism and stock photos. I can scarcely do it justice except to link to Peter Kidd’s thorough deconstruction of #receptio #receptiogate
Part 1: https://mssprovenance.blogspot.com/2022/12/the-receptio-rossi-affair-part-i-staff.html
Part 2: https://mssprovenance.blogspot.com/2022/12/the-receptio-rossi-affair-part-ii.html
Part 3: https://mssprovenance.blogspot.com/2022/12/the-receptio-rossi-affair-iii-my.html
Part 4: https://mssprovenance.blogspot.com/2022/12/the-receptio-rossi-affair-iv-my.html
Part 5: https://mssprovenance.blogspot.com/2022/12/the-receptio-rossi-affair-part-v.html
CNRS researcher at École normale supérieure Paris. Auditory perception, psycholinguistics, hearing loss. My toots are searchable #tootfinder.