Show newer

doth sometimes prosper, even when we dare call it treason.

> Fewer Americans today consider childhood important, with 40% saying it is extremely important for parents to have their children vaccinated, down from 58% in 2019 and 64% in 2001. There has been a similar decline in the combined "extremely" and "very important" percentage, which was 94% in 2001 but sits at 69% today.

> The declining belief in the importance of vaccines is essentially confined to and Republican-leaning independents, as the views of and Democratic-leaning independents have changed little over the past 24 years. Twenty-six percent of Republicans and Republican leaners -- half as many as in 2019 -- believe it is extremely important for parents to get their children vaccinated. In the initial Gallup poll on vaccinations, Republicans and Republican leaners (62%) held similar views to Democrats and Democratic leaners (66%); the two groups now differ by 37 percentage points.

news.gallup.com/poll/648308/fa

I may, eventually, make my peace with much of the madness of the last thirty years. Honestly I don't expect it: I probably won't live long enough to see most of the damage undone. But it's at least *possible*. If the upcoming election and all the others go as well as they possibly can, if the Republican Party purges itself of the cult, if the cultists themselves come back to some semblance of reality ... yes. It could happen.

, and those who enabled its rise from the grave, I will never forgive. Not now, not in a decade, not in a generation, not in a century or a millennium or the lifetime of the universe.

🎼Take back what I paid
For another in a motorcade ...

This goes in the same bin as and in my frequently used funny-sexy-cool test. Only other people can decide if you're or or . Not only do you not get to make that judgement about yourself, it's a terrible mistake to try—because the more you announce to people that you are that thing, the less likely they are to see you that way. Show, don't tell.

Many desirable characteristics, including and and , work the same way. I *try* to be empathetic, and as far as I can tell from the reactions of the people around me, I succeed most of the time. And I trust many of them to tell me if I'm being a self-centered jerk. But being "an " isn't an inborn characteristic. It's a *behavior*—and like all good behaviors, past performance is no guarantee of future results.

On a more personal note: senior can make or break a unit. Good ones take care of their subordinates and do wonders for , while bad ones terrorize personnel and a fair number of the junior , sending morale into the toilet. I'm reasonably sure was in the former category, and I hope people who served under him speak out against the .

forces are confirmed to have taken at least 100 square kilometers of territory (link below) and they're steadily advancing as of the last reports. In *Kursk* Oblast, a name to conjure with.

This isn't a cross-border . This is a solid, well-thought-out to bring the war—finally—to the . Which isn't the only way to win a , but it's probably one of the most effective.

I doubt they'll stay there long-term. has been pretty clear from the start of the war that they have no interest in any part of , including those which were historically part of Ukraine. You know, because they're not .

But they do want *all* of their country back, and this gives them an unparalleled chance of getting exactly that. Devastate Russian supply lines, take a bunch of prisoners, and give complacent civilians reason to doubt Putin.

With this and the overwhelmingly positive reaction to ' choice of , I feel like the war is going pretty well on both fronts. Слава Україні, or as we say in English: fascists, go fuck yourselves.

understandingwar.org/backgroun

No doubt the had ready-made talking points for each of ' possible picks. Their first line of attack against is that he will "unleash Hell on Earth."

If you want to take someone who radiates "regular guy" like Walz does and turn him into a badass? That's *exactly* the way to do it. Thanks, Donnie! Good job!

thehill.com/homenews/campaign/

was my second choice, after , but I think he's a solid pick. would have been a mistake. Countering and 's fake with the real thing is a great idea.

I'm reasonably sure doesn't want to be the kind of who shoves the in a broom closet, to be pulled out only when needed. If I'm right, then picking someone she likes and can work with personally was really important. Of course I have no idea how the various contenders' personalities mesh with hers, but if she chose Walz on that basis, it should minimize any friction for both the election and the administration.

Also, let's be blunt here: needed to reassure older white voters, and Harris may need Walz for the same reason. It sucks, but demographics still matter. A lot.

Oh yeah, don't overlook the fact that Walz was the one who brought "" into the national conversation. That has to have earned him a few points. 😀

About .

For most adults, most of the time, weird is at most a mild insult, and for many adults it's a compliment. "Yeah, I'm weird. You're weird. We're all weird here. All the best people are, you know." That kind of thing.

But for many *many* children, it's vicious. On the elementary school playground, weird is about the worst thing you can be. It lasts well beyond that, too, at least into high school. Even young adults—which I mean literally, old enough to drive and vote and get married—are often pretty exclusionary on the basis of perceived weirdness. I was one of those kids, and I bet a lot of people reading this were too.

So yeah, now that it's suddenly everywhere, *adult* adults calling each other weird and meaning it to cut ... I do feel a certain amount of childhood PTSD climbing out of the depths of my brain. Decent people accept that there are some insults we should never use, no matter what our opponents call us, and I kind of want this to be one of them.

I'll deal. Because I know that whatever dim ancient terrors it stirs up, memories of ostracism and beating and worse things I won't go into here, for its current targets it's scary as hell *right now*.

Bullies take it as an article of faith that their victims must never use their own tactics against them. Violence of the tongue and the fist are the exclusive province of those at the top of the ladder. The weirdos down on the bottom rungs ... how *dare* we? Don't we know our role is always to be the stepped on, never those who step?

Oh, we can call them hateful and cruel and evil. Those are insults, but they're also attributions of power. Let us hate them, so long as we fear.

Weird is powerless. Weird is helpless. Weird is the little kid at the corner of the playground crying because no one wants them on the team. Weird is tears of futile rage.

Victims fighting back *effectively* is their worst nightmare.

They go low, we go right down to the bone. Hateful and cruel and evil are clumsy punches, easily dodged and laughed at before they close in for the kill. Weird, of all things, has turned out to be the hidden razor blade, the cut that doesn't even sting until they see the blood on the ground.

You know, they're really weird that way.

NASA will have to wait until after the closing ceremonies.

Dvorkin's Somethingth Law: the less people know about any particular job, the more likely they are to believe that it can be effectively replaced by .

*Any* job. Those who are adamant that AI is antithetical to creativity, and any or or that has ever been touched by AI is automatically crap, but unquestioningly accept that jobs involving deep knowledge and technical skill and professional judgement can be done as well or better by a 'bot ... I see you.

We haven't seen either of the , Tux and Neo, for a few days. The cat food we put out is still getting eaten, and we're *reasonably* sure it's cats eating it rather than raccoons, because the plates are still in place when the food is gone. Raccoon raids, which we know well from previous experience, usually aren't that neat. But I'd feel better if I could actually see the cats eating it.

I've bragged a lot about our cat-rescuing record, and with good reason. Everyone at the we worked with was frankly amazed that we brought in four wild-born litters with no deaths, injuries, or disease. Throughout the metro area, there are a whole bunch of households with happy, healthy cats who are there because we made it happen. The cats must remember dimly if at all, and the humans will never know their stories. *We* know, and that's enough.

But we're not perfect. A few—all adults, never any of the born here—have slipped away. Too wild, too cautious, perhaps in some cases too abused. They come and eat the food we provide, seem to be responding to our friendly overtures, and then leave as silently as they arrived. All we can do is wish them well, and hope they found their way to some kind of forever home.

Some patients die. Some friendships end. Some dreams fail. Sometimes you know why, sometimes you don't. There is no perfection to be found anywhere in the universe.

I just really hope these two go on the win list. I'm selfish that way.

And to be clear, I *like* (or , as we called them in my day, grumble mutter snore). I think they're a clever and useful way to convey tone that doesn't always come through in text any other way. But the specific ways some of them get used are ... unintentionally revealing.

Show thread

🤡 is right up there with 🤣 as a way to announce to the world that you have nothing worthwhile to say, on any subject, ever.

This meme has crossed my feed in a number of places lately. I'm sharing it for debate, not for approval or agreement. If you share from my post, please leave my commentary intact. This has been a public service announcement.

is very nearly a straw man. I'm willing to concede that there are *some* people who treat like a religion, but their numbers are tiny and they have zero influence on the conduct of research AFAICT. Anti-science who come up with memes like this, OTOH, are numerous and disturbingly influential.

It's also amusing how the meme assumes is a gold standard against which other intellectual pursuits must be measured. The author assigns to the same unquestionable authority he accuses others of assigning to science.

So I'll stake my claim: scientific —in the literal sense of the study of methods—has done more to illuminate "how we know what we know" in the last couple of centuries than formal epistemology has done in millennia. If this be scientism, make the most of it.

You know, I'm getting really tired of reflexive anti-Americanism†.

There is a lot to criticize about culture. Yes. And politics and history and whatever defines us as a nation. We have done and continue to do some really appalling things. Those things should be caught and dissected and disposed of in the biohazard incinerator ... once we understand their biology in intimate detail and make sure we know how to fight them should they infest us again. Because they *will*, and others like them, as long as a country called the of exists.

The same is true of every other country on Earth. If you think it isn't, at best you're dangerously naive. At worst ... well, you're as bad as those Americans who are responsible for the very worst of our reputation. Every country needs criticism. Every power structure relies on violence, implicit or explicit, to maintain itself. Every culture has its strengths and weaknesses. Every people, like every person, needs to be self-aware. To be *better*, or at the very least to avoid being worse.

Because of our unique reach—economic, military, cultural—the rest of the world has good reason to worry more about us than most other countries. (Although some give us a run for our money, which is a *startlingly* American phrase now that I think about it.) Practically everyone on the planet has a stake in what happens here. I have no problem, at all, with criticism from outside, as long as it's well-founded. The same applies to internal criticism, for that matter.

I have a big problem with the idea that Americans *by virtue of being Americans* are automatically ignorant or greedy or violent or ... hell, fill in the stereotype of your choice here. There's a very long list to choose from. It's just as ridiculous as the idea that we're inherently better than everyone else, chosen by history or divine favor to lead the world into a golden age of freedom and prosperity, and anyone who doesn't see that needs to be, uh, *liberated* into understanding.

And because that latter idea is so prevalent, a lot of the former ideas come up as reflex. I get that. I'm just asking you to remember that there are a third of a billion of us, and not only are we *that* kind of American, a whole lot of us actively fight against it. Many of us try to fight in ways that will actually make a difference, too ... rather than the kind of "oh yeah, we're irredeemably awful" nihilism that turns into humblebragging really fast.

Please don't use a club when a scalpel is called for. That's all.

===

†Everyone understands what I mean when I say "America" and "American" and its derivations, yes? Good. I am profoundly uninterested in having, again, what may be the stupidest argument on the internet ... and that's a very high bar.

In the first movie, "Alien", the characters are all basically blue-collar freight haulers. They have no reason to be knowledgeable about first-contact problems, and so when they make mistakes, it's completely understandable.

And when they actually show insight and rationality, it stands out as heroic.

But in "Prometheus", these are supposed to be hand-picked experts.

And they're just BAD at their jobs.

Show thread

Poetic license now that I think about it carefully: it was actually *eleven* years. But three of those years were part-time, so it kind of works if you turn your head sideways and squint. Anyway, I like the flavor of the classics.

Show thread

On a Los Angeles Times post, somebody commented, "Californians may not miss Elon Musk, but the economy will."

I was curious enough to look this up: last year had $24.9 billion in , and $8.7 billion, while 's was $3.9 trillion. So very roughly, Tesla + SpaceX revenue was almost 1% of California GDP, although I doubt all or even most of that money actually stayed in California.

That's not insignificant, but it's not vital either. Given California's overall economic power, I think the state will absorb Musk's departure just fine, especially since there's no way to move a major industrial operation all at once. And most of Tesla's manufacturing is already outside the state.

The main economic impact of moving everything to may be to (slightly) ameliorate the famously high housing prices in the Bay Area and LA metro. Also, it will raise the average intelligence of both states. That's a win-win!

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.