The open peer-review process they do at F1000 is exactly what all journals should be doing. I love that they publish the peer review, in detail, right next to the article themselves.

f1000research.com/articles/9-1

@freemo
This is very good, cause I see that most researchers read these papers like a fact book (just to cite them as a fact in their paper) having peer review alongside can reveal the doubted sides of the paper as well :ablobderpy:

@mur2501 indeed. Though im more concerned with the readers than the researchers

@mur2501 If by researcher you mean someone doing research and considering it as source material (something to cite), then no. Most readers are reading it to learn what the publication has to teach. They may also do research (as scientists as a whole are more likely to read it), but pretty much anyone witht he expertise to understand it is likely going to read journal publications.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.