What's preventing Ukraine from doing a hostile action against NATO triggering article 5 and be invaded by NATO to restore peace and stability?

@kreyren the one thing you do not possess - common sense. The only thing the people want is for the war to stop asap, while the only thing you seem to want is for their country go up in smoke, while you pleasure yourself watching russian soldiers die.

@namark Their country is already in smoke and i do not find death of humans and animals a pleasing thing to watch rather distressing.

NATO has obligation to defend it's members through art 5 if ukraine attacks NATO then this obligation would have to be fullfilled.

Follow

@kreyren oh yes and for the purposes of defending against the loosing side, NATO will absolutely have to invade ukraine, clash with russians, and ensure that absolutely nothing is left of the country in the aftermath, and sure as hell not any hope of any form of autonomy. Will you ever stop spamming the timeline with your weird fetishes?

@namark i didn't say NATO fighting russians i said NATO fulfilling it's obligation to defend it's members namely defend against ukraine

@kreyren so you didn't mean it as a provocation and excuse for a clash, instead ukraine should show that they are indeed crazy extrimists, and that rf was right to invade, and that nato and rf should team up to royally fuck em up?

que "noooo, the benevolent nato soldiers do not cause harm when they invade, they only bring peace and prosperity wherever they go, every country should wish nato invaded them"

@namark didn't say every i said that in this situation it would bring peace and stability without confronting the russian army

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.