namark @namark@qoto.org
Joined Jan 2020
@DeadlyTurtle Text above and below it? Did you notice? What you are attempting to argue against, is not the point that I was making. Read my reply to Eris.
@Eris Sorry for delaying your satisfaction, you just demand it so many times, that's it getting really boring. Yes as I have said many times before, for the purposes if this discussion I'm having with you, I agree.
@DeadlyTurtle
> wahh I can't read
I tied yo help some one with that problem in this thread already, and it didn't go anywhere so, good luck
@Eris that your first reply ever in this thread is false
@akorenchkin you can see the "joined" date on my profile @bonifartius
@AR-15 If you want to see my argument it's in my reply to OP, and in my first reply to Eris. Past that it's Eris pretending that I'm arguing something I'm not arguing.
@Eris cause I couldn't care less as I've said @bonifartius
@Eris no I assumed it's true to allow you to get to your point... but you had no point other than the assertion, and you can't let it go
@bonifartius
@Eris I'm just teaching you english... a snark is not an argument itself... I can assume something that I cocider dumb to be true for the sake of a single discussion, to explore ones mind and possibilities... but that is beyond you it seems, you just want your truth to be manifested so hard, that you can't understand that I couldn't care less
@Eris no it is not
@bonifartius
@Eris no you can't, you can pretend to argue with a snark, or whatever else you are doing here, doesn't make it a real argument
@Eris you can't argue with a snark, literally look up definition, it's not embarrassing, it's ok to do
@AR-15 I don't care to be nice yo you, I'm sorry again if I heart your feelings, you can block me or mute me or whatever
@Eris no it accepts it, however snarkily, but that is not acceptable to you. You want me to argue about it, but I'm not and it's pissing you off @bonifartius
@Eris I did that already many times directly. It is that I accepted your premise the moment you presented it in your very first reply in this thread.
@AR-15 @bonifartius
@Eris@kiwifarms.cc@AR-15@poa.st Because I answered the first time and I can't bare repetition, It's too boring
@Eris @AR-15 you don't have to guess an obvious implication if you understand the language. If you do not understand the language nothing I say matters @bonifartius
@Eris what are you a lawyer? or one of those fedposters fishing for crap? can't understand an implication? again I would ask you to learn english
@Eris you may ignore a sub-thread in case you didn't know, and once again there is no argument, you haven't presented one as of yet, you just pretend that I'm asserting the opposite of what you are asserting when I'm actually accepting it repeatedly
@AR-15 @hyperfuneral @bonifartius
