@tony@social.nursetonyf.com @nursetonyf@qoto.org

@davidaugust @johnpavlovitz
One topic I don't see being openly discussed is how many Americans truly are one-issue voters. When you boil away all analyses, when you zoom out of focus and lose all the analytical details and think like a nonpolitical nonanalytical person drinking a beer on the back porch, the fire that burns the brightest is the innocent sweet helpless aborted babies. As humans and as mammals, we care for the young of our community. Evolutionarily, the fundamental principle is NOT survival of the fittest individual... in contrast, it's survival of the fittest group of individuals. So, groups and group dynamics are in our genes. Humans love*love*love our sweet and innocent soft and clean little babies and we can't stand the thought of them being scraped out of a womb even though we all know—since we went through that stage ourselves and don't recall anything about that time—there is little or no consciousness or suffering at that time. And since God knows everything ahead of time all the time, maybe He in His wisdom chooses not to put a soul into those that He knows aren't going to naturally or artificially make it out alive. We don't know how God doles souls. If they do have souls, it's little consolation for people to hear that being aborted would then be a free pass into Heaven without the suffering of this world. Even if some do find comfort in thinking of it that way to make themselves feel better about it, not everyone can do that and almost no one can differentiate between voting for a pro abortion government representative and scraping the babies out themselves. So many people feel the guilt of association. They're afraid "what if God tells me my vote caused the deaths of the following aborted babies and they're gonna vote on whether or not I get through the pearly gates." People feel that voting for pro abortion legislators and representatives is actually committing a sin of their own because they premeditatedly chose to vote for that person knowing what the person would try to legislate if they won. "Women's right to choose what happens to their own bodies" still comes across as "Go on ahead and scrape out those unborn babies just because you didn't wrap it up or strap it up." People would pay for higher bread to save aborted babies. People would begrudgingly pay more taxes and vote for someone who will make them pay more as long as it protects innocent sweet little unborn babies. It boils down to the rights of grown women (vacillatingly painted as important because she should be responsible enough to avoid a pregnancy and unimportant bc she's a woman) vs the rights of the innocent and vulnerable and voiceless. The babies win every time. More people got off the couch to protect the babies and many people stayed on the couch to avoid association with the sin of premeditated voting for the murderability of babies... in case that has moral consequences on my own soul on judgement day.

To shift the abortion issue away from the same recycled points made over the ages that never ever go anywhere, I think it needs to be reframed as legal protection for doctors to provide medical care to the full extent of their training and experience. They wanna pass out so much immunity and impunity... give some immunity to doctors so they feel legally safe to make the right medical decisions for their patients instead of being legally obligated to protect their own license by neglecting deterioration until it meets the legal minimum standard to begin treatment. Yes, it's a potentially more patriarchal way to make the point, but unfortunately, sometimes we have to resort to pulling the levers we have rather than pulling no levers at all. Most people trust doctors to make the right choices. Our legislators need to trust doctors, too, and it's going to take us all working at this without relenting to get it straightened out.

One topic I don't see being openly discussed is how many Americans truly are one-issue voters. When you boil away all analyses, when you zoom out of focus and lose all the analytical details and think like a nonpolitical nonanalytical person drinking a beer on the back porch, the fire that burns the brightest is the innocent sweet helpless aborted babies. As humans and as mammals, we care for the young of our community. Evolutionarily, the fundamental principle is NOT survival of the fittest individual... in contrast, it's survival of the fittest group of individuals. So, groups and group dynamics are in our genes. Humans love*love*love our sweet and innocent soft and clean little babies and we can't stand the thought of them being scraped out of a womb even though we all know—since we went through that stage ourselves and don't recall anything about that time—there is little or no consciousness or suffering at that time. And since God knows everything ahead of time all the time, maybe He in His wisdom chooses not to put a soul into those that He knows aren't going to naturally or artificially make it out alive. We don't know how God doles souls. If they do have souls, it's little consolation for people to hear that being aborted would then be a free pass into Heaven without the suffering of this world. Even if some do find comfort in thinking of it that way to make themselves feel better about it, not everyone can do that and almost no one can differentiate between voting for a pro abortion government representative and scraping the babies out themselves. So many people feel the guilt of association. They're afraid "what if God tells me my vote caused the deaths of the following aborted babies and they're gonna vote on whether or not I get through the pearly gates." People feel that voting for pro abortion legislators and representatives is actually committing a sin of their own because they premeditatedly chose to vote for that person knowing what the person would try to legislate if they won. "Women's right to choose what happens to their own bodies" still comes across as "Go on ahead and scrape out those unborn babies just because you didn't wrap it up or strap it up." People would pay for higher bread to save aborted babies. People would begrudgingly pay more taxes and vote for someone who will make them pay more as long as it protects innocent sweet little unborn babies. It boils down to the rights of grown women (vacillatingly painted as important because she should be responsible enough to avoid a pregnancy and unimportant bc she's a woman) vs the rights of the innocent and vulnerable and voiceless. The babies win every time. More people got off the couch to protect the babies and many people stayed on the couch to avoid association with the sin of premeditated voting for the murderability of babies... in case that has moral consequences on my own soul on judgement day.

To shift the abortion issue away from the same recycled points made over the ages that never ever go anywhere, I think it needs to be reframed as legal protection for doctors to provide medical care to the full extent of their training and experience. They wanna pass out so much immunity and impunity... give some immunity to doctors so they feel legally safe to make the right medical decisions for their patients instead of being legally obligated to protect their own license by neglecting deterioration until it meets the legal minimum standard to begin treatment. Yes, it's a potentially more patriarchal way to make the point, but unfortunately, sometimes we have to resort to pulling the levers we have rather than pulling no levers at all. Most people trust doctors to make the right choices. Our legislators need to trust doctors, too, and it's going to take us all working at this without relenting to get it straightened out.

I dislike being forced to use the pharmacy my insurance makes us use.

Pharmacist: "Would you rate your general health as poor, fair, good, or excellent?"

Me: "No, I wouldn't."

Pharmacist: "How would you rate your ability to perform activities of daily living, poor, fair, good, or excellent?"

Me: "Privately."

This is a quick—and I'm sure incomplete—primer for moving instances if you don't want to start from scratch on follows and followers:

[If you do decide to start from scratch and tell us your new handle so we can follow you, make it a clickable link cause ain't nobody gonna type all that in:

htt ps:// domain.name/ @ username without spaces

https://social.nursetonyf.com/@tony ]

EASY (5 steps to find and sign up to someone else's instance while keeping your followers on this one),

Medium (host your own instance if you have or get a domain name and pay for a hosting service to do all the rest for you for a monthly fee),

Pro (if you dedicate a physical server and compile Linux code [you probably wouldn't be reading this])

The EASY way:
1a: Find an instance. There are several ways, but the tool I prefer is https://mastodon.help/instances it lets you search for keywords that are in the name/description. You want an LGBT friendly instance? type it in and many will come up. You should exclude ones with closed registrations to find one to sign up on... (if some with closed registrations interest you, visit the local timeline to browse it, you can still view the timeline on closed registrations and follow individuals, you just can't live on those). To find one to live on, you need open registrations.

1b: While you're searching instances, what kinds of things matter to you in an instance? This search tool lets you filter out noxious ones, it reports how many users are on the instance and how many were active last month, how many characters they allow per post (500 is standard, some fancy ones allow way more like this one so you don't have to thread if you're wordy [I originally migrated to qoto because of the very high character limit, but since, I've discovered that they are considered noxious for "free speech BS" which I havent personally seen in my short time here, but due to how they phrase it, their position not to block instances (silence only unless hacky bots), and maybe for past moderation issues, many many instances put qoto on their reject list to block them, so I won't have access to as many instances as I want to have... the things important to me are character limit and many server connections])

2. Now that you've found an instance and signed up or requested to sign up, on the new site, go to
"Preferences>Account>Moving from a different server" to create an account alias.

3a. If you have blocked/silenced ppl on the old site (mastodon.lol) go to the old site,
"Preferences>import and export" and download the CSV files for the blocks. I don't know if this step is necessary or if this info carries over from the migration, BUT you may not be able to access the old account at all after the migration, so if this step is needed, it's best to do it now. You can also request an archive of your posts but I'm not sure what you could ever do with that file. better to have it if you want it just in case.

3b. On the old site (mastodon.lol) go to
"Preferences>Account>Move to a different account>Configure it here" and enter the handle (username@domain.name) and your password for the old account whose settings page you're on (mastodon.lol)

4. Your follows and followers will get ported over from the old account to the new account.

5a. If you had blocked/silenced anyone on the old instance, then after the migration, check to see if your blocked/silenced info has carried over to the new one by going to
"Preferences>Import and export" you may see the info already carried over. If you don't, this is where you upload those CSV files you downloaded.

5b. Done with the easy version

MEDIUM
If you have (or get) your own domain:

1. Go to the settings for your site and add a subdomain (for mine, www.nursetonyf.com, I added social.nursetonyf.com, the subdomain is the prefix to the main site name, it replaces the www).

2. Find a hosting site/service. I'm using https://masto.host which seems fairly affordable (I started with the $6 plan but I'm already near my limit on the media (20GB) so I just now upgraded to the $9 plan (50GB)... they said that the Media will go up for about 7 days because media contains all the media from everyone you follow to make your home [and maybe federated] timeline, so it grows a lot for 7 days then levels off).

3. Point your subdomain to your hosting site by setting your DNS settings the way the hosting site says, and wait for it to update. When I did it, it had an error for several hours, saying I needed to change something, but it wasn't true, I had actually done it right it just takes time for it to become a part of the worldwide web. I kept checking for errors because it said errors, I was afraid it wasn't right but didn't see anything to change other than what I had changed, but it ended up turning all green after a few hours.

4. After your site is a site, go to it and sign up as a new user. Some people give themselves 2 users, one for general use and one for admin, but I'm not sure if/why that's needed, so I am just one user not 2.

5. If you're on masto.host, then after you have a new user, go to the dashboard of masto.host and "change user role" to make the admin account have the admin settings appear in the setting area of the mastodon page.

Done with medium.

PRO:

If you're a code-writing Linux pro, you haven't read this far, and you know more than I do about it! If you want to become a pro, there are many how-tos out there but I'm not a pro (yet).

#migrate #migration #moving

@aintist @StillIRise1963 @samhainnight

BEFAST symptoms indicate a potential neurological emergency. One of the things that can cause those symptoms is a stroke, but they can be caused by other things. Medicine isn't a tidy group of singular causes for singular symptoms, it's a messy beast where one symptom could be caused by a dozen different things. If one of those dozen things can be life-threatening, then you go to the ER and get the life-threatening things ruled out (or confirmed and treated). If I have chest pain, it could be gas, heartburn, a sore rib, a rib muscle spasm, or a heart attack, so I'd have to go to the ER to see if it's a heart attack. Numbness on its own could be a sign of a stroke, so it's safest to make sure it's not one, but it can also be due to MS as you said, and it could also be caused by a brain tumor, head trauma, brain abscess, encephalitis, viral infection, lupus, B12 deficiency, diabetes, hypothyroidism, kidney problems, and other causes. When in doubt, call the primary care provider and have someone there triage whether you should schedule an appointment or go to the emergency room, since they know your history. If they are closed, try to see an urgent care that is in the same health system so they can see your records easily. When in doubt, check it out (in the ER).

@konomikitten
I don’t hear people talking about cooperative economics enough. Money matters! That’s why I don’t want a bigot baker to be forced to bake my gay cakes… I don’t want him to get our gay dollars! Support an ally baker! When we give our money to bigots, they have our money to do bigot things with. I know how hard I work to make dollars come my way, I WONT have my own money work against me, my community, our rights and interests and safety. It literally matters. You don’t have to understand or be very involved in politics to understand that companies take our money and pay politicians to write laws against us. Buying bigot chicken is like waiving your own rights. I use the HRC corporate equality index to guide my purchasing. I don’t buy bigot bread, bigot gas for the car, bigot electricity for the house, bigot clothes, I don’t give my money to any bigots that I know of. And I won’t. And I don’t get why people don’t care where they send their money.

@mekkaokereke
I never knew this, thanks for sharing! Sounds like one of the earliest recognitions that diversity is good for business. A Kroger exec was speaking at the Cincinnati Wellness Your Way festival and mentioned their view that diversity is good for business, both in regards to customer base and workforce.

I’m a big believer in supporting ally businesses. The Human Rights Campaign has an annual Corporate Equality Index to grade companies’ LGBT+ inclusiveness. I’d love to have a resource that lists Black-owned and anti-racist businesses.

Do you know of any such “green book?” I know how hard I work to make dollars come my way, so I do all I can to keep my money out of the hands of bigots. Companies and CEOs are so vocal about their political views nowadays, it’s sometimes easy to see if it makes the news or if they’re on twitter praising demagogues. I quit a lawn fertilizer company over the owners twitter. I’d love to have access to a list to make it all more transparent, and more sure to steer my money away from them.

@StillIRise1963
Wow, that’s scary. Glad it was figured out and fixable. Grateful that someone recognized it as an emergency situation. I recently had a patient that didn’t recognize that her inability to use one side of her body normally was an emergency, she stayed at home monitoring the situation a little longer than ideal. Her problem turned out to be a stroke. There’s a mnemonic for when to seek emergency care for potential stroke (and other neuro problems):
BEFAST
Balance problem
Eye vision changes
Face drooping/uneven smile or eyebrows
Arm/leg weakness (especially one side)
Speech problems
Time to call 911 because time is tissue
Thanks for sharing.