@dtgeek Everybody aims for PG-13 at any cost, and shapes things to play well in China too, so I believe it. I’m so glad Coogler resisted both impulses, making a completely American film for adults.
Sinners deserves every dollar it earns, and every record it sets.
@jeffjarvis the correct headline was so easy: Trump Administration Escalates Attack On Harvard With New Justice Dept. Investigation.
@tamas I know it's a year later, but the 24 pair in box four seems to unlock this for me.
If R5C2 is a 2, then R7C1 is 2 because the two cells in C2 can't be. Or because R6C1 is then a 4.
BUT also, R5C7 is an 8, so R9C7 is a 2 and R9C6 is an 8 and R7C6 is a 2, which means R7C1 can't be 2. Oops!
So R5C2 is 4, and that seems to resolve everything smoothly from there as a series of single options.
It's often difficult to tell the difference between a stranger wallowing in ignorance and a stranger deliberately pretending to be ignorant, with AI-driven bots an additional factor in an already difficult game.
Still, it occurred to me as I saw someone pretend that progressive tax brackets are anti-capitalist, that even if the commenter in question was a troll, it is an issue that involves a lot of numbers, and so others might benefit from being reminded how things work.
Someone online wondered what is the point of capitalism if working hard leads to "penalization" in the form of a higher tax rate. But of course, there is no point at which earning more money leaves you with less money.
Even at a 90% top marginal income tax rate, which we had during the 1950s and 1960s (boom times!), earning one extra dollar more than $400k would mean another dime in your pocket.
Still, one might say, it seems odd that the harder I work, the more goods I make, and the more goods I make, the higher percentage tax that gets taken from me!
This seems like bad reasoning on multiple levels.
Firstly, nobody should kid themselves: How hard you work has very, very, very little to do with how much money you earn. Right there are people working much harder than anyone reading this and probably making much less. There are also people doing next to nothing and earning more every year than any of us will earn in our entire lifetimes. I think it is fundamentally wrong to talk about the effect of income tax brackets in the abstract, as if they'll hit all of us, rather than putting concrete numbers to is. CEOs don't work 200 times as hard as their employees, and yet earn 200 times as much on average. That's concrete.
Secondly, why focus on the percentage brackets at all? In one sense it's as simple as this: the more goods you make, the more money you earn! I'll say it again: There is no point at which earning more income means less money in your pocket.
But let's say you really are fixated on the percentages. Okay, fine. Try this one on for size: The tax rate in the US is 37%, period. It just is. But as a country, we recognize that people may be struggling to make ends meet, ad might be enormously burdened by that, so we give several different kinds of discounts.
We give everybody a "standard deduction" on which we charge no tax at all. So a single person earning $14,600 pays zero income tax on any of it. We also allow for some deductions even with the standard deduction so that money paid to charities reduces the tax you might owe, too.
After that we give additional discounts, since you're still working your way up the earnings ladder.
If you earn $578,125 or less, you get a small discount, and if you earn $231,250 or less, you get an even bigger discount.
You get a really big discount if you earn $182,100 or less, and another small one at $95,375 or less, and a huge one at $44,725 or less.
I mean, at that point you're getting two-thirds knocked off the normal 37% rate, which is huge!
I think it is a very good thing that the tax structure makes things easier for those of us who haven't yet reached $578,125 in income per year. I would be delighted to one day reach my full 37% tax rate!
"A severe solar storm is headed to Earth that could stress power grids even more as the U.S. deals with major back-to-back hurricanes, space weather forecasters said."
From @AssociatedPress: "NOAA has notified operators of power plants and orbiting spacecraft to take precautions. It also alerted the Federal Emergency Management Agency about possible power disruptions," though Florida isn't expected to be impacted.
One of the points made in that book seemed really important: ultimately, this is all very dangerous. People will get hurt and even die, so the cause must be worth that. The author says climate change is.
@manton I do think the EU is moving in the right direction now, and Apple is clearly being petty. Still, it’s a monumental sea change for US companies, who have largely captured the regulatory apparatus for nearly 50 years, so I’m not surprised they’re terrified of acting without certainty.
I mean, I can’t think of a precedent in the last half-century for a company being forced by the US government to launch a new product, can you? Getting in trouble for things you DO, sure. Getting in trouble for something you DON’T DO? People start talking about “prior restraint” and constitutional issues!
I’m all for it, especially for companies at Apple’s size, but it is new territory, so it’s going to be weird for a while.
@majorlinux The fascinating book “How to Blow Up a Pipeline” was focused on corporations from a climate change perspective, but offered interesting guidelines. They hypothesized that companies had taken climate change seriously as of X date, and pointed out more projects had been built since then, so the sabotage or destruction of those new projects would really just be restoring the status quo.
@Adam_Cadmon1 Another favorite I watch every few years! Three Kings is one of the few war movies I’ll watch. Excellent, excellent movie.
@Adam_Cadmon1 IF I am remembering the DVD case correctly, he had top billing for that movie. Or maybe shared it with Christina Applegate.
@Adam_Cadmon1 you won’t regret The Big Hit! Bookeem Woodbine is hilarious, Lou Diamond Phillips shines, and Marky Mark ties the whole thing together. Oh, and Avery Brooks! A master.
@Adam_Cadmon1 One of my favorite movies still! That said, I still call him Marky Mark.
@mogwai_poet We saw Jackie Chan do it in real life, so video games seemed reasonable. I mean, sure, Chan used two walls, but we’re playing 2-D games!
@davew It would have include a cancellation of all outstanding debts before he could consider it.
1. Trump can still vote, because the people of Florida voted to extend voting rights to felons, which the Florida legislature then softened to say that a convicted felon can vote only if the state in which they were convicted allows convicted felons to vote, which New York does.
2. If we didn't allow felons to run for office, any truly corrupt political party could twist and manipulate to ensure their leading opponent was falsely convicted of a felony, eliminating them from contention. IOW, what Trump falsely claims happened to him could and would actually happen.
@bart Surprisingly, Mo Brooks of Alabama did just that, immediately after the verdict.
https://x.com/RepMoBrooks/status/1796290920436089007
HuffPo posted their story hours after this, and so clearly could have included Brooks' statement at that time. Wouldn't have been as funny, though.
@Eliot_L Right, it's the old posts I'd miss. I get why they aren't easily migrated, I just... well, I guess I wish I'd set up on my own domain from day one!
Some thoughts I've been noodling on recently, from books or social media or newsletters:
- The washing machine has changed the world more than the internet has.
- Streaming services have burned through vast fortunes to come in second to cable+broadcast in watch times. 7% for Netflix? Wow.
- There is not, and never has been, such as a thing as a "free market."
- Current AI models demo well, but are proving to be less useful than most people hoped for, unless you're a student. Doesn't mean they're useless, just not world-changing.
- I'm starting to think every company with revenue of 50 billion dollars or more is too big, and needs to be broken up just because. As a start.
- I'm very interested in the idea of a US Federal Jobs Guarantee at $15/hour.
- If company executives could actually face penalties for their actions that exceed the profits from those actions, the world might be a better place. If they could face prison terms, it definitely would be.
Love conquers fear
#nerdery #books #puzzles #ttrpg #anime #Christian #feminist #antiracist #photography #sudoku #golang #python #OpenWeb #AIart #GenshinImpact #tfr