@realcaseyrollins Not really man! There is a clear difference between Free speech and Hate speech. QOTO does the regulation for that, and it should be carried out IMO.

On this note, I have also expressed in Political conversation here. But nothing has been moderated or suppressed. The freedom to express your voice shouldn't be the platform for freedom to hate someone.

@shibaprasad I would like to know what hate speech isn't free speech. I think all speech, even hate speech, is free speech if it doesn't threaten people with violence.

In any case, what I find funny is the concept of any form of moderation or removing content, while also saying "no censorship". True lack of censorship means complete unmoderation.

@realcaseyrollins

Valid points. But by that logic also banning spam bots that sign up and post 5 posts a second of advertisements is censorship.

There is a difference between the censorship of ideologies or opinions vs the censorship based on actions.

Hell even deleting threats of violence is technically censorship in the broader sense.

@shibaprasad

@freemo @shibaprasad Yeah and that's perfectly fine! To be clear I like your policies, I'm just not sure that the claim of "no censorship" is true.

@realcaseyrollins

Its a by-line, so its meant to be more of a summary than a detail. The text below outlines it in more detail and where the boundaries are.

@shibaprasad

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.