I (often?) complained that the history that's taught in schools is history of politics and of military. I've realized that the history of military isn't really taught outside of its intersection with history of politics: the influence of technology on military was very spottily covered (I remember hearing about effects of the invention of crossbows, firearms in general, and sailing ships (as opposed to oar-powered ones), but nothing about observation balloons -- even in the context of Napoleon, I can't recall a single discussion of use of new ways to communicate, nothing about Haber process (!), nor about improvements to aiming, guidance, and explosion timing for various weapons).
Why is history, as taught, so devoid of talking about effects of inventions, even in areas that it sort-of covers? My experience is from Polish schools, is it different in other places?
> most schooling covers some parts
But not the important ones even! I'm sure that Haber process (which made blockading South America not an effective strategy to deny one's opponent access to explosives and made both explosives production and agriculture much more prolific) was not even a footnote in my historical education.
> the human aspects or effects are not really part of it perhaps because of the less-factual speculation involved from opinions and ethics (...)
But the inventions themselves are also absent. I'd expect them to be mentioned _because_ of their effects, which are the effects that are apparent in what is described. I'm not even talking about trying to figure out whether an invention was generally helpful for people (which IMO isn't called for when teaching history: speculation on how the world would look like without it, and speculation on why it appeared when it did is, but ascribing value to outcomes is IMO out of its scope).
@robryk Could summarise it as a combination
- Pick and Choose (by those at the top / decision makers in education)
- Too much to mention
- Mentioning too much get people really learning! (it's unwanted perhaps overall)
- It's hard for people bnot to be political, historians or those pretending to distribute education
Sorry if I wasn't on point with what you said - I also re-read thing again to try catch in a different light