Show newer

@mcc

The problem of warning about a failure of the system that warns is similarly amusing.

pol 

@lumi

What do you mean by decentralization? That of OSes, that of messaging protocols, or something else?

Physicists wielding ignorance as a super power 

@sophieschmieg

I've recently learned of jokes that people call "jokes in the sense of Littlewood" (I'm somewhat puzzled why a single example yielded the name though): mathoverflow.net/questions/388

@munin

Disclaimer: likely confirmation bias.

I was somewhat surprised to realize that a few organizations I know of had ~1 leadership change in ~30 years of their existence (close to now than their creation) and the change actually worked out fine. In all the cases it was gradual, which might indicate that the plans you mention were there all along, or might be a different contributing factor for success.

US healthcare 

@pvaneynd @foone

Why care about point 1? I thought (and quick Google search seems to confirm) that breast cancer risk is affected by recent hormonal environment (as opposed to one that was around at some time during development). (Or did you mean that they wanted to include both women and transmen?)

@dymaxion @tarheel @tknarr @lapcatsoftware

So you're proposing something similar to secure boot root key changing? I wonder why that mechanism (albeit with some woes) is mostly workable on PCs, but there is basically nothing similar on mobile phones (I don't think you can lock an Android bootloader with different software signature verification keys, can you?)?

@bsdphk @adamshostack

Do you know whether the extent of liability is limited to the losses that the supplier could reasonably expect? (I don't remember the name for the concept; I mean the limit that causes the liability from e.g. delayed supply of some trivial item not to be arbitrarily high by virtue of the item being necessary to satisfy a buyer's obligation that is connected with absurdly high delay penalties.)

@bsdphk @chris

The exception seems somewhat contradictorily described: point 14 on page 7 first says that the exception applies to software developed _or_ supplied outside of commercial activity and then says that the exception does not apply if the software is supplied commercially, regardless of how it's distributed. I expect that the intended reading is the latter (it's also what I would a priori expect), so am somewhat confused by the "(...) this Directive should not apply to free and open-source software developed or supplied outside the course of a commercial activity (...)" passage.

@munin

> prices that could change in the time it takes you to grab the item off the shelf and scan it at the register

Do you know how that is legal? I thought the price tag constituted an offer.

Die Maus sagte: "Obwohl alle Feuerwehrautos rot sind (...)".

Stimmt das wirklich in Deutschland? In der Schweiz stimmt es nicht, mindestens in der Stadt Zürich.

@dymaxion @tarheel @tknarr @lapcatsoftware

How would whatever is doing the exporting decide which things that present themselves as hardware tokens to trust (iow, what would it want to know about a keypair before it encrypts the export to it)? I can either see a version where it trusts any keypair provided by the user (and is imo equivalent to just straight up export) or one where it wants some sort of attestation chain that a trusted manufacturer promises that this is really a hardware token, which then creates a potential for lock in. Do you see some other option?

@freemo

I wonder what you think about:
- if the victim is not breathing and there's a spare helper available, send them off to find an AED,
- if the victim fell from a nontrivial height, impacted into something headfirst or backfirst (or you suspect that in face of lack of witnesses) do not move them unless they aren't breathing/are unable to breathe and tell them not to get up if conscious, but do not try to restrain them,
- if the victim is unconscious in an ~enclosed space, esp. under ground level, with no obvious reason for the unconsciousness and there is no well person in the space space, be extremely wary of entering it (or just don't).

@dpiponi

Greatest in the sense of with most positive effects, with largest effects, or something else?

@kuba @wojslaw

Nie wiem, czy tak jest (strzelałbym np., że stężenie alkoholu w cieczy w żołądku ma znaczenie, bo IIRC on sie dostaje do krwi osmotycznie), ale chciałbym zauważyć, że stopień upicia i natężenie kaca mogą się zmieniać inaczej.

@munin The reason I chose facts might be slightly atypical: I think that figuring out the connections from the facts teaches me more about reasoning in the area in question than the opposite (because the opposite is closer to reverse engineering why people find these interrelationships in particular important).

@Sbectol @Averixus

Agreed that it's hard to measure value of interventions in an adversarial situation (because their existence changes the adversary's behaviour). Given that TfW apparently also has conductors I don't see how the additional deterrence would be significant.

BTW for context, it seems that TfW is getting ~120Mpounds per year from tickets out of ~700Mpounds of revenue (which include some non-passenger services and mainly grants from various levels of government). Source: grep for "revenue from contracts" in tfw.wales/sites/default/files/

@kuba pewne ilości alkoholu znajdziesz w rzeczach typu sok jabłkowy (z powodu niepożądanej fermentacji iiuc) i bigos (który co prawda nie jest napojem). Jaki jest ten próg w Polsce?

@aredridel

They didn't say how they packed it though. (I once ordered a mug and teapot from Ikea and received a cubic package with the side of ~1m. To be fair, both the mug and teapot arrived undamaged.)

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.