robryk @robryk@qoto.org

@_thegeoff Ah, I see -- you didn't mean that there's an expected "round" value but that there's a expected order of magnitude.

@_thegeoff where do the expected values come from (that they are 1eFOO out from)?

@isomer

So you have to dedicate a thread to that library and do your own message passing to actually makes calls to it, right?

@isomer

So you have to dedicate a thread to that library and do your own message passing to actually makes calls to it, right?

@isomer

So you have to dedicate a thread to that library and do your own message passing to actually makes calls to it, right?

@mcc I wonder how they handle "any pronouns".

@grrrr_shark

Gemeinschaftszentren in Zürich the city have music practice rooms that can be rented at some reasonable rate. I haven't used them, but a friend of mine had violin lessons in one. Maybe something similar exists in Winterthur?

@ShaulaEvans

I thought that CO detectors are, assuming you have a smoke detector, useful only if you have some sort of burner or furnace in the house (which can start combusting incompletely due to e.g. blocked exhaust flow). Are there other situations when they are likely to trigger?

@8petros

Czyli zakładasz, że powietrze z zewnątrz przejdzie przez filtr dokładnie raz?

Pytam, bo wydaje mi się to założeniem, które istotnie wpływa na konstrukcję całości. Z pozytywów, umożliwia ono połączenie filtrowania i wentylacji. Z minusów, wymaga używania filtrów które dadzą rozsądną jakość powietrza po pojedynczym przefiltrowaniu i nie filtruje (ale rozcieńcza) zanieczyszczenia wyprodukowane w mieszkaniu (-> gotowanie, zakaźnie chorzy ludzie).

Możliwe alternatywne podejście to filtrowanie powietrza z mieszkania wypuszczając przefiltrowane też do mieszkania i zajmowanie się wentylacją ~osobno. Wady tego podejścia to chyba większe trudności w spodowowaniu, żeby powietrze w całym mieszkaniu było filtrowane. Za to można używać wtedy znacznie gorszych filtrów (bo można mieć przepływ przez filtr(y) znacznie większy niż przpływ wymiany powietrza, więc ~każda jednostka powietrza w mieszkaniu przejdzie przez filtr kilka razy).

@robey

Huh, did the names ever switch? I remember adduser always being the interactive one (that has a better understanding of GECOS' format), and useradd being the one amenable to scripting.

@aeva

What are your latency requirements? (The broadcasting setups I've seen add OoM of small seconds to latency; I've seen lower only from things intended for use as voice chat.)

@delroth

Did you notice whether the paw-waving-cats have the paw motion and rolling motion coupled? (I'm curious whether they tried to uncouple the two.)

@azonenberg

Why is your next hop a globally routable address anyway? I'd expect next hops to be addressed using link-local addresses.

@ruuda Yeah, the SDS claims that contact with eye is dangerous and gives the standard post-contact instructions (take contact lenses out if able, wash with large water flow for XX minutes, contact a doctor). I don't get what's that trying to prevent.

How does metallic gallium damage eyes? I see lots of SDSs for gallium claiming that it's corrosive (well, that's kinda true) and that it causes heavy eye damage in contact with eyes.

@_thegeoff @evilscientistca

When I was in high school, I took a slide rule instead of a calculator to physics exams. :)

Hm~ also, can one use a Vernier correction on slide rules? It seems that it was a thing: https://www.sliderulemuseum.com/Patents/US/2424713.pdf (I don't recall the nonvertical lines on any slide rules I had.)