@cjd that's a prediction, not a method
it seems that the severity of any given crisis is secondary upon the assumption that it is used for a political excuse to arrogate power
you then have two perspectives:
a) what is the danger of a given crisis as such?
b) what room for manouevre do the optics of said crisis allow bad actors?
tbh both seem academic if you simply focus on securing comms/money supply and personal safety/security - yet that's also a recipe for civic decay as it sort of precludes any form of politics and cedes that realm to those who would abuse it
@cjd how useful is "intent of others" on a global scale? or do we take the talebian skeptical empiricist route and focus on local exposure?
both seem a bit flaky outside of their domain, although the later seems far more robust
@cjd over the last few years I've found myself teetering about various states of conspiratorial thinking - there must be a method for decision making here and I'm not sure where to begin
@amerika I said working, not works
@jk I love going to a place with an absolutely stunning set of speakers, coming out of a world class amplifier and signal chain, and playing just absolute jank lo-fi mono garbage, while talking about the Air between the notes and The Imaging.
I used to work in a hifi shop, and I would insist that people listen to, like, Sun Ra's home tapes from the 60s, while just going on about the quality of the reproduction.
Somehow, this sold equipment.
@11112011 touché
@11112011 fed
@11112011 turning off a pipeline reduces supply, no matter who you're plan B is
@11112011 well, turn on Nordstream 2, not the little piss stream Putin is milking us w/rn