ActivityPub spam, onboarding
#ActivityPub #spam seems to be spreading nowadays. It isn't new, I moved away from my previous instance because it didn't have active mod volunteers.
#Snikket's idea of invites (#XMPP, not AP) seems like a good way to both control spam and onboard users. Mods can rate-limit account creation by judiciously creating invites. Users can generate 1 invite each, but can expect to also get banned if their invitee is a spammer. User-invited users would have a real account to bootstrap their connections.
ActivityPub spam, onboarding
@olives I have not seen too many approaches being available. There is open-house #ActivityPub, clique-y #Zot / #Nomad or this invite system which seems to be in between.
Scale isn't something a federated system should care about. That and vulnerable groups are a non-tech problem, they are not nails for the tech hammer.
It is fine for somebody giving out an invite to be liable in that sense, it will make sure invites are used judiciously.
ActivityPub spam, onboarding
@tetrislife In my view, online spam has a couple of elements:
Bots and farms of humans paid to solve captchas. Often, it's purely a bot. Bot masters usually expend more resources on large sites than they are willing to expand on smaller sites.
There is also the accessibility problem where as you put up barriers like this, the number of people who will go along with it will go down dramatically. That isn't a matter of tech but of psychology.