BREAKING: Getty Images just filed a copyright and trademark infringement lawsuit against Stability AI in Delaware District Court. Getty alleges that Stability copied more than 12 million Getty photos to train Stable Diffusion. Full complaint here: https://copyrightlately.com/pdfviewer/getty-images-v-stability-ai-complaint/
Le dernier numéro des #AnnalesHSS est en ligne.
Au sommaire :
- #Savoirs modernes en perspective
- Histoire d'un #livre (#goncourt2021)
- Biens #communs
Et un train de comptes rendus sur "#Livres et circulation des #savoirs
👉 Sur Cambridge Core: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/annales-histoire-sciences-sociales/issue/F7D8CCF32F488C9EE6C71813A3E866B5
👉 Sur Cairn: https://www.cairn.info/revue-annales-2022-3.htm
@shriramk Interestingly, DeepL’s translation into German is more literal:
Ich danke Ihnen für die wohlwollende Prüfung dieses Schreibens und versichere Sie, Herr Dekan, meiner vorzüglichen Hochachtung.
It’s always fun to translate French formal closings:
French: En vous remerciant de bien vouloir considérer la présente avec bienveillance, je vous prie de croire, Monsieur le Doyen, à l’assurance de ma considération très distinguée.
English: Thank you for your kind consideration of this letter.
I guess “of this letter” already makes this excessively verbose ;-)
Interesting new research on the #evaluation of #interdisciplinary researchers:
Riccardo Fini, Julien Jourdan, Markus Perkmann, and Laura Toschi: “A New Take on the Categorical Imperative: Gatekeeping, Boundary Maintenance, and Evaluation Penalties in Science” https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2022.1610
#Pandoc 3 introduced #Markdown support for #wikilinks:
[[pandoc|https://github.com]]
There is no consensus across tools whether the link title should come before or after the pipe character, so pandoc supports both. Choose by enabling either of the new extensions
+wikilinks_title_after_pipe
or
+wikilinks_title_before_pipe
Works with #CommonMark, too: for GitHub wiki input, use gfm+wikilinks_title_after_pipe
Twitter killt die freie API und damit viele spannende Projekte.
Du hast einen Bot und brauchst eine neue Heimat? Wir bieten dir ein neues Zuhause!
Come to think of it, not so different from some chatGPT answers I have read...😁
---
RT @DrGBuckingham
"Accepting the job"
Some real horror AI-generated images here! (found in FB, not mine)
https://twitter.com/DrGBuckingham/status/1622170650264719360
@CerstinMahlow Extremely hardcore!
I had the great honor of reviewing 1 of the best contributions to #history of #science in 2022 - THE SQUARES (by @ccmmody; Open Access at MIT Press): https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/1/article/879621
Here`s my own take on how a square scientist - a representative of the "silent majority" in the 1970s - looked like:
I know there are countless gems buried in the depths of @internetarchive but I was stunned when I run across this rare book about Symbolics Lisp Machines, "Lisp Lore: A Guide to Programming the Lisp Machine" by Hank Bromley:
Here's the full process I went through to summarize a 35 minute YouTube video using Whisper plus GPT3
It had some manual steps, but automating it doesn't feel like it would be a particularly hard project using the tools we have right now
https://gist.github.com/simonw/9932c6f10e241cfa6b19a4e08b283ca9
How long before we have good automated information extraction from videos?
About five years ago, I felt sad that the best / most informative sources of information on so many things had moved to video because video monetizes much better than text, but it now seems plausible that, in the next N years, automated systems will be able to take a 30 minute video and turn it into text that takes 5 minutes to read.
Nous avons eu la chance de pouvoir discuter des enjeux de la préservation du jeu vidéoà la RTS. Merci beaucoup de nous avoir donné l'occasion de faire découvrir ce sujet.
The thing I'm most interested in, this morning, are the leaks suggesting that GPT-4 is a "faster" version of ChatGPT. Could be nonsense. But if not ... making these things lighter weight (or able to handle longer contexts at the same weight) would really change the business case and (also, selfishly) matter a lot for academics.
Over on Twitter Mike Sharples posted link to this paper. (https://twitter.com/sharplm/status/1621537532163792896?s=20&t=XZQCRYerFEV_gUE1cf1Iow)
Worth a read if this is your interest (genesis of technological ideas):
Tbh, hopefully it will force the social science researchers to diversify their dataset and finally read the papers published weekly since 2015 with titles along the lines of "Stop doing research with Twitter and generalizing it, it's a weird website with weird demographics and weird interactions".
Associate professor of digital humanities, University of Lausanne, Switzerland
Professeur associé en humanités numériques, Université de Lausanne, Suisse